Hvorfor er Indien ikke muslimsk?

Shares 0

Fierce and persistent Hindu resistance to the Islamic Jihad prevented the complete Islamization of India

Unlike the complete Islamization of Persia, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Turkey, North Africa, the Islamization of India was never complete. After more than one millennium of Muslim Tyranny from 715 up to 1761, more than 70 percent of the population of India remained Hindu. This was NOT due to any Muslim charity or benevolence, since the murderous and savage beastlike Muslims have none of these characteristics.

The Muslim tyranny in India was as blood-thirsty and insidious as it was in all parts of the globe that were unfortunate to be trampled by the Jihadis. The Hindus suffered initial setbacks due to the innocuous but ill-founded belief amongst them, as amongst all other non-Muslims, that the Muslims too were normal human beings, who would after a victory, settle down to govern the defeated population. But once the nightmare of Muslim tyranny began, the Hindus grew wiser relatively faster than most of the other unfortunate victims of the Islamic Jihad.

Læs historien på Islam Watch

Limewoody

3 Kommentarer

  1. Nu vi er ved det, hvorfor er Indien ikke buddhistisk? Er det ikke mærkeligt at det land, hvor buddhismen opstod, ikke er mere buddhistisk? Sagen er dog ganske enkel: Da stor-mogulerne (muhammedanere) indtog Indien, saa besluttede de sig til at anvende hinduerne som en slags dhimmier, mens buddhisterne blev udryddet, og det i en grad, saa et buddhistisk liv end ikke er værdisat mht. mandebod o.l. hos de muslimske lærde. Naar der ikke er buddhister i Indien i dag, skyldes det muslimernes massemord paa tilhængerne af hin religion.

    Med venlig hilsen,
    Kristoffer Mogensen

Leave a Reply

Din email adresse vil ikke blive vist offentligt.


*