Hele interviewet med Nobelpristageren Luc Montagnier om at Wuhanvirus indeholder sekvenser af HIV-virus

Hvad er sandt og hvad er løgn?

Her er en artikel af Montagniers partner i forskningen Jean Claude Perez:

WUHAN COVID-19 SYNTHETIC ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION

Jean-Claude PEREZ *1 *1 Phd Maths & Computer Science Bordeaux University, RETIRED Interdisciplinary Researcher (IBM Emeritus, IBM European Research Center on Artificial Intelligence)

Abstract

The main result of this updated release is the formal proof that 2019-nCoV coronavirus is partially a SYNTHETIC genome. We proof the CONCENTRATION in a small région of wuhan New genome (300bp) of 3 different régions from HIV1 ENVELOPPE gene and 3 others from HIV2 and SIV (ENV and POL RT). All this is remarkable and bears the mark of a desire for organization of a human nature: LOGIC, SYMETRIES.

In this article, we demonstrate also that there is a kind of global human hosts adaptation strategy of SARS viruses as well as a strategy of global evolution of the genomes of the different strains of SARS which have emerged, mainly in China, between years 2003 first SARS genomes and the last 2019 COVID-19 Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome.

This global strategy, this temporal link, is materialized in our demonstration by highlighting stationary numerical waves controlling the entire sequence of their genomes.

Curiously, these digital waves characterizing the 9 SARS genomes studied here are characteristic whole numbers: the “Fibonacci numbers”, omnipresent in the forms of Nature, and which our research for several decades has shown strong links with the proportions of nucleotides in DNA. Here we demonstrate that the complexity and fractal multiplicity of these Fibonacci numerical waves increases over the years of the emergence of new SARS strains.

We suggest that this increase in the overall organization of the SARS genomes over the years reflects a better adaptation of SARS genomes to the human host.

The question of a link with pathogenicity remains open.

However, we believe that this overall strategy for the evolution of the SARS genomes ensures greater unity, consistency and integrity of the genome.

Finally, we ask ourselves the question of a possible artificial origin of this genome, in particular because of the presence of fragments of HIV1, HIV2 and SIV retroviruses.

Keywords: SARS; Wuhan COVID-19; Fibonacci Numbers; Fractal Genome; Numerical Stationary Periodic Waves; HIV1; HIV2; SIV; Synthetic Genomes.

COVID-19 origin: Virus shrouded in mystery, here’s why

WHO noted cases of ‘escape’ from Chinese lab in 2004, what’s behind conspiracy theories

Her er et abstract fra den omtalte indiske undersøgelse:

Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

Prashant Pradhan, Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Akhilesh Mishra, Parul Gupta, Praveen Kumar Tripathi, Manoj Balakrishnan Menon, James Gomes, Perumal Vivekanandan, Bishwajit Kundu doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871 This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?].

Abstract

We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.

Der er masser af kompetente kommentarer.

1 Kommentar

  1. Altså iflg. Politiken, organet for den højeste oplysning, er sagen allerede fuldt opklaret. Det hele er Trumps skyld, og Kina er helt uskyldig. Så hvorfor er der nogen som vil undersøge sagens detaljer?? Det kan da kun være for at hvidvaske Trump og hans virus-udspredende regime. Trump har sikkert selv personlig puttet ting fra flagermus ind i corona-virussen. Hvordan kan man dog tro andet??

    Se også bloggen om MSM klynk om forfølgelse ovenfor. Se kommentarerne.

Skriv et svar til Henrik M Annuller svar

Din email adresse vil ikke blive vist offentligt.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.