På Købehavns Universitets hjemmeside under Institut for Tværkulturelle og Regional Studier kan man finde en pressemeddelelse (14. juli 2006), hvori den såkaldte islamolog (lektor i arabisk) Jørgen Bæk Simonsen udtaler:
“Krisen i Mellemøsten bliver stadigt mere intensiv for Hizbollah og Hamas, fordi den israelske regering med dagens og gårsdagens angreb har vist, at den vil slå ned på alt, hvad de foretager sig. Til gengæld kan krisen også brede sig til resten af regionen gennem de israelske terrorgrupper, som vil se dette som en oplagt mulighed for at intensivere terrorangreb – ikke mindst i Tyrkiet, Jordan og Egypten, som alle er lande med diplomatiske forbindelser til Israel, udtaler Jørgen Bæk Simonsen, lektor i arabisk ved Københavns Universitet. Derudover vil krisen yderligere destabilisere situationen i Mellemøsten, dog ikke sådan, at man vil se krig mellem lande. Ingen tør nemlig “krydse klinger” med israelerne, hvorfor terror bliver den eneste udvej for mange. Og det er det, der er så ulykkeligt, idet civile igen bliver ofrene for terrorgrupperne, siger Jørgen Bæk Simonsen.”
Mon ikke det er en skrivefejl, men hvad hjertet er fuld af løber munden over med – sprogbrugen er vist ikke helt neutralt. ‘Slå ned på alt, hvad de foretager sig’ og ‘terror bliver den eneste udvej’. For på samme side (19. juli 2006) står også:
“Når Israel sætter en straffeaktion ind over for Libanon, bliver det mødt med forståelse fra vestlige politikere og medier. Og det er der faktisk en forklaring på. Israel har nemlig altid haft tætte historiske, kulturelle og politiske bånd til Vesten, fordi Israel altid har orienteret sig mod Europa, forklarer mellemøsthistoriker fra Københavns Universitet Jørgen Bæk Simonsen, der mener, at det har været et strategisk redskab for samtlige af de israelske regeringer at understrege samhørigheden med Vesten. Jørgen Bæk Simonsen peger endvidere på, at man i Vesten har en tendens til at opfatte Israel som offer,”
Men det var egentlig for at finde dette her jeg kiggede på hjemmesiden, men det fandt jeg ikke?
“Jørgen Bæk Simonsen påpeger dog, at det er forkert at konkludere, at wahabisme generelt er det samme som ekstremisme og dermed terrorisme. Wahabisme hænger ikke nødvendigvis sammen med voldelig adfærd,”
Presseklip
Nej det var nazisme eller kommunisme heller ikke 🙂
Indgående bekendtskab med mainstream wahhabisme kan stiftes hurtigt og autoriseret her:
http://islamqa.com/index.php?ln=eng
her et enkelt eksempel
The reason why Jihad is prescribed
“Some of the reasons why jihad for the sake of Allaah is prescribed in Islam are as follows:
1 – The main goal of jihad is to make the people worship Allaah alone and to bring them forth from servitude to people to servitude to the Lord of people. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allaah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allaah (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zaalimoon (the polytheists, and wrong-doers)”
[al-Baqarah 2:193]
Uha, nej da Wahhabisme har intet med vold at gøre 🙂 Hvem kan dog få en så absurd idé ?
Nu vi er ved det kan vi lige tage denne her:
If a woman rebels against her husband and disobeys his commands, then he should follow this method of admonishing her, forsaking her in bed and hitting her. Hitting is subject to the condition that it should not be harsh or cause injury. Al-Hasan al-Basri said: this means that it should not cause pain.
I øvrigt er der intet i koranen som siger at hun skal slås bare lidt og at man ikke må skade hende og under alle omstændigheder har hun bare at adlyde manden – ellers!
“The purpose behind this is not to hurt or humiliate the woman, rather it is intended to make her realize that she has transgressed against her husband’s rights, and that her husband has the right to set her straight and discipline her. ”
Det har jeg behandlet relativt omfattende her :
Mini resumé af kvindens stilling i islam
Ja, det med israelske terrorgrupper er naturligvis det rene vås. Alle og enhver ved jo godt, at der kun findes en eneste israelsk terrorgruppe og det er den israelske regering.
Jeg kan i øvrigt heller ikke lide wahabitter; ikke siden jeg blev tvunget til at bære dem som ganske ung.
Der er intet nyt i, at Israel bygger på terror – det burde efterhånden være alment kendt.
Hvis det ellers er gået nogle forbi, er her lige et par berømte zioniske udtalelser, til en genopfriskning af hukommelsen:
1)
“We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.”
Israel Koenig, “The Koenig Memorandum” in 1980
2)
“We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves.”
Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983
3)
“Has any People ever been seen to give up their territory of their own free will? In the same way, the Arabs of Palestine will not renounce their sovereignty without violence.”
Vladimir Jabotinsky (the founder and advocate of the Zionist terrorist organizations), Quoted by Maxime Rodinson in Peuple Juif ou Problem Juif.
just when you think it’s safe to leave “the old house”,to get some fresh air, smell the flowers,wacthing the birds and the bee’s,and the great looking women,(in their burka’s!! ouch), then (Again),you discover, a couple of “inmates” has escaped the “asylum”,(hopefully only on a week-end pass) an taken to poison the free-blogging-world,(again),sad,very sad,
Sandt som det er sagt – det er sørgeligt, at et lands eksistensgrundlag bygger på terror og attentater mod andre medmennesker.
“We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.”
Israel Koenig, “The Koenig Memorandum” in 1980
Media Monitors (http://www.mediamonitors.net)
An article archived on the Media Monitors Web site is filled with questionable assertions and bogus quotes (some of which were debunked in Part I.) The following quote (which also appears on the MIFTAH Web site) was attributed to Israeli Northern District Commissioner Israel Koenig, supposedly from his controversial report on Israeli Arabs in Galilee:
We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.
Source given: Cited in Lustick, Ian, Arabs in the Jewish State, University of Texas Press, Texas, 1980.
Investigation: Neither the source given (Ian Lustick’s Arabs in the Jewish State) nor the actual report itself contains any mention of “terror, assassination, intimidation or land confiscation”.
The Koenig Report or “memorandum” as it is sometimes referred to, was a private document of recommendations written in 1975 by civil servant Israel Koenig, the Interior Ministry’s official in charge of the Galilee, to alter the demographic balance of the region in favor of the Jews. The recommendations were rejected by then Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin, denounced by senior Cabinet ministers and rued by then foreign minister Yigal Alon who expressed great regret that the recommendations were ever written. It provoked controversy within Israel after being leaked to Al Hamishmar, the publication of Israel’s Marxist party, Mapam. Koenig’s recommendations included expanding and strengthening Israel’s Jewish presence in the Galilee, applying legal consequences to Arabs expressing hostility toward the state and Zionism, enforcing tax collection from the Arab sector, cutting family subsidies to Arabs with large families, eliminating preferential acceptance of Arabs into Israeli universities, channeling Arab students into studying the physical and natural sciences rather than humanities, and encouraging young Arabs to study abroad and emigrate. As controversial as Koenig’s proposals were at the time, however, there was absolutely no suggestion of using “terror,” “assassination,” “intimidation” or “land confiscations.”
Summary: Fabricated quote, false source
http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_article=775&x_context=2
Patriot: første opslag på Google 😀
Det må du kunne gøre bedre. Er du bare en antisemitisk jødehader?
jeg har meget muligt lavet en brøler med hensyn til følgende citat:
“We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population”.
– jeg er ikke bleg for at undskylde, at jeg har fejlciteret fra det kontrovertielle Koenig Memorandum.
Fejlciteringen gør mig ikke til antisemitisk jødehader eller nazist, og min pointe med, at Israel bygger på terror, kan heller ikke dementeres.
Her er lidt mere historie:
“Menachem Begin, who was later awarded the Nobel Prize for peace, is the same man who planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin. Ex prime minister, Shamir, was originally a member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the even more radical “Stern Gang,” which committed many vicious atrocities.
Shamir himself has defended the various assassinations committed by the Irgun and Stern gangs on the grounds that “it was the only way we could operate, because we were so small. So it was more efficient and more moral to go for selected targets.” The selected moral targets in those early days of the founding of the state of Israel included bombing of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin.
April 9, 1948: A combined force of Irgun and Stern Gangs committed a brutal massacre of 260 Arab residents of the village of Deir Yassin. Most of whom were women and children. The Israeli hordes even attacked the dead to satisfy their bestial tendencies. In April, 1954, during Holy Week, and on the eve of Easter, The Christian cemeteries in Haifa were invaded, crosses broken down and trampled under the feet of these miscreants, and the tombs desecrated. The Israeli military conquest, therefore was made against a defenseless people, who had been softened up by such earlier massacres as Deir Yasin (where 250 Arabs; men, women and children were massacred).
The Jew, Weizman, referred to the massacre as this “miraculous simplification of our task,” and Ben Gurion said that “without Deir Yasin there would be no Israel.” Americans are not told that ten percent of the Arabs killed by the Israelis in 1948 were Christian, and that ten percent of the Arab property confiscated belonged to Christians. Nor are they told that Israel’s massacres and military actions forced 100,000 Christians to become refugees.
Accounts by Red Cross and United Nations observers who visited the scene said that the houses were first set on fire and the occupants were shot down as they came out to escape the flames. One pregnant woman had her baby cut out of her stomach with a knife. Reminiscent of the acts committed by their brother Jews in Russia during and after the Bolshevik (Jewish) takeover. The head of the International Red Cross delegation in Palestine, Jacques de Reynier, drove into the village and was met by a detachment of Irgun terrorists. In his report of the massacre the previous night, he wrote: “All of them were young, some even adolescents, men and women armed to the teeth: revolvers, machine-guns, hand-grenades, and knives, most of them still blood-stained. A beautiful young girl with criminal eyes showed me hers (knife) still dripping with blood, she displayed it like a trophy.”
PP Det der lugter fælt af anti semtisme og propaganda :
“The Israeli hordes even attacked the dead to satisfy their bestial tendencies.”
“the Bolshevik (Jewish) takeover.”
Det giver en lidt dårlig smag i munden selv om jeg ikke vil udelukke forbrydelser begået af israelerne, såvel som Muslimerne, såvel som alle andre.
->7 har du en kilde til det?
Kig eventuelt her, eller lav en google søgning:
http://christianparty.net/jewishmassacres.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing