Eksplosive anklager: Retsmedicinere og politi blev truet angående George Floyds dødsårsag

Bombshell Claim: Medical Examiners Bullied Over Floyd’s Cause of Death

Minneapolis police officer’s defense alleges that medical witnesses were subjected to coercion and retaliation.

Last week, counsel for Tou Thao, one of the former Minneapolis police officers charged in the death of George Floyd, filed an explosive motion for sanctions against the prosecution that alleges, among other things, that the testimony of Hennepin County Medical Examiner Andrew Baker in the trial of Derek Chauvin “was directly and indirectly coerced by the State and its agents” and that the former chief medical examiner for the State of Maryland, who testified for the Chauvin defense that Floyd’s death was due to cardiac arrhythmia, has been subjected to threats against his medical license.

Dr. Mitchell has set the stage that he will threaten the trade and professional reputation of any physician who suggests that Mr. Floyd’s death could be labeled as “undetermined.”… Dr. Mitchell has essentially stated that any medical expert who wants to testify that Mr. Floyd’s death could be undetermined should, and will, face penalties by him. Dr. Mitchell’s accusations and spurring of legal fallacies creates a chilling effect for Mr. Thao and violates his due process rights in that it has become extraordinarily difficult to find medical experts who are willing to state that Mr. Floyd’s death was undetermined in fear of their professional reputation and licensure.

Given Dr. Mitchell’s open letter, this averment is a masterpiece of lawyerly understatement. And, placed in the context of the threatened mob violence that has permeated and polluted the prosecution of these former Minneapolis police officers, it doesn’t begin to state the enormity of the problem facing the defense.

In that regard, consider the threat sent to Barry Brodd, the retired police officer and use-of-force expert who testified during the Chauvin trial that the defendant’s actions had been reasonable and met the standards of accepted police protocols.

Within a matter of days following his testimony, Brodd’s former home in California was vandalized. According to the New York Post, three women, Rowan Dalbey, 20, Kristen Aumoithe, 34, and Amber Lucas, 35, have been arrested and charged with felony vandalism of that residence.

Rowan Dalbey, Kristen Aumoithe, and Amber Lucas (Santa Rosa Police Department)

Læs mere om sagen her.

3 Kommentarer

  1. Og resultatet er at en hæderlig politibetjent må sidde 22 år i fængsel for at tilfredsstille en flok voldelige psykopaters forvredne tankegang.

    Retfærdighed my ass!

    • Om han er hæderlig kan vi vist ikke udtale os om, men han er helt sikkert inkompetent. Når man har med en narkopåvirket person at gøre som klager over åndenød, så tjekker man selvfølgelig jævnligt at denne stadig trækker vejret.

  2. Den normale straf for “second-degree murder”, for en person uden kriminel forhistorie er 12,5 år, så det må siges at være en overordentlig kraftig forhøjelse, som kun kan skyldes det store politiske pres.

    Efter hvad jeg har set af forsvarets modgåelse af anklagers beviser, burde han være frikendt for mord og fordi anklageren ikke medtog mindre forseelser burde han være sat på fri fod straks.

Leave a Reply

Din email adresse vil ikke blive vist offentligt.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.