‘Forskere’ har forfalsket videnskabelige data om luftforurening i The New England Journal og Medicine

Epidemiologen J. Enstrom gennemhuller artikel der taler for strammere regulering af luftforurening.

“The authors have falsified their research findings.”

Nyt studie har analyseret mere end 2 millioner dødsfald i Californien i relation til luftforurening med PM2,5.

Konklusionen lyder:

In summary, our empirical evidence, supported by literature and logic, is that current levels of air quality, ozone and PM2.5, are not associated with or causally related to acute deaths for California. Our results, well summarized in Fig. 4 ;  Fig. 5, show no effect of ozone or PM2.5 at 12 μg/m3 or across all doses examined. There is no indication of any effect at low doses, for example. These results should be taken into account in any future revisions of the NAAQS for PM2.5 and O3.

ANTI-GREEN

Læs også: It’s unprecedented in the history of business — the largest U.S. oil company Exxon Mobil (XOM)  has been officially captured by anti-oil political activists.

BOOK REVIEW: ‘Scare Pollution’ a Pulitzer Prize-worthy Piece of Investigative Journalism

Most of the American public is unaware the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with the help of the American Lung Association and radical environmental groups, has nearly succeeded in an attempted takeover of absolutely all industry in the United States. How could EPA accomplish such a grand scheme? By claiming exposure to particles in the air as small as 2.5 millionths of a meter can cause death in a matter of minutes, hours, or days.

It is called the PM2.5 rule, and the best scientific research shows these particles are ubiquitous and, contrary to EPA’s claims, are harmless.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Din email adresse vil ikke blive vist offentligt.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.