Fake-news-DR og fake-news-tv2 har jo altid løgnagtigt påstået at der IKKE var valgsvindel ved valget i 2020 . Nu er det bevist : Der var 125785 registerede vælgere i Fulton County, men 148319 “stemte” ! Med andre ord er der MINDST 148319-125785= 22534 stemmer for meget! Og valget i Georgia blev jo afgjort med en forskel på 11779 stemmer, så demokraterne kunne få det 50 senator sæde og dermed flertal, altså ca 2 gange de fuppede 22534 “stemmer” . FUP og svindel, som Trump og andre altid har hævdet
Hør Glenn Bech vise hvor meget, der var galt med den “afstemning ” her
Taget herfra
FULL TRANSCRIPT:
YES
Speaker: Glenn Beck
Okay, so this 250-page report has come out from the Election Oversight Group. The reason why I want to talk to you about this today is because of what happened with Pam Bondi yesterday. And I honestly, I need some new insight on this because I just don’t know where to go with this Pam Bondi thing.
I thought it was not good yesterday. I just don’t think she’s capable of fixing the errors that have just piled up and we have to fix the DOJ. It must be fixed because there’s too many important things that are riding on it. One thing that they are doing that is right is the Fulton County, Georgia situation with the election of 2020.
The morning after the election, just to remind you, Georgia’s Secretary of State went on national television and said 4.7 million votes had been cast. He said only about 2% remain to be counted, which is roughly 94,000 ballots. And he said at this moment, the margin is decisive.
He even suggested if one candidate won 100% of all of the outstanding votes, it’s not going to change the outcome. But when the final tally first came in, the total wasn’t 4.7 million votes that had been cast. It was 5.023 million. Okay. Wait, what?
And in Fulton County alone, the absentee ballots reportedly rose from 74,000 to more than 148,000 between election night and final certification. Where did that come from? And that’s why this shift happened which reversed the apparent outcome of the state.
That’s why Donald Trump was like, “Wait a minute, cheating is going on.” The report now states no known explanation has been provided to justify the surge. Pause. If the numbers change by that magnitude after officials publicly declare with near final certainty, then again, we’ve got to get it right.
Not almost right. We need it right. We don’t need defensiveness or dismissal. We need clarity. The report then goes into the chain of custody. Okay, listen to this. Investigators found that 148,000 absentee ballots were accepted and counted without first performing mandatory signature verification.
Tens of thousands allegedly arrived at State Farm Arena in unsecured mail carts. Wait, what? Do you know what chain of custody is? Chain of custody is really important. It’s not a partisan phrase. It is a basic legal principle.
Chain of custody comes into play a lot of times in criminal trials, also financial audits. When you gather evidence, you have to know who had that evidence. That’s one of the problems with the Epstein files. What’s the chain of custody? You had all the evidence. Whose hands were on that?
You have to know. And if the chain of custody breaks, then you can’t rely on that being reliable anymore. You can’t count that as reliable information because you don’t know how it got from this place to the next place. Okay. The next thing they found was the missing tabulator tapes.
This is really important because election law requires daily zero tapes. What that means is it is a check to prove the machine starts at zero. It requires closing tapes to document the total at the day’s end. Okay, so it proved it was at zero and then it proves that this is the number of votes that came in.
According to testimony cited in the report, more than 100 required tabulator tapes representing about 315,000 early votes weren’t signed or weren’t signed properly. State investigators say they couldn’t locate the required zero tapes for early voting on many machines. What? You can’t what?
Now, the report concludes that the statute requires accounting and chain of custody records, but they don’t exist in the entirety of early voting. Okay. Well, that’s a really big failure. Then the last problem is the math problem. The county records reportedly show 148,318 absentee ballots counted.
Yet, again, this is going to be hard to do. I’m going to give you time so you can work out the math on this. You had only 125,785 voters. 148,000 votes cast, but only 125,000 people showed up to vote. So, what? That’s a pretty big gap.
More than 22,000 ballots in a race that was decided by 11,779 votes. After multiple certifications, the counts didn’t match one another. Now, here’s where this becomes serious, way beyond politics. Philip Stark, he does stats. He’s from Berkeley, so I would say he’s probably not a conservative.
He came in and he reviewed all of the aspects of the process. Here’s what he didn’t do: He didn’t say this is widespread fraud, but he did say there are real reasons to distrust the election outcome. He found machine counts and audit tallies disagreed substantially, even about the number of ballots that were cast.
He wrote that some ballots, listen to this, appeared to be included at least twice in the original counts and multiple times in recounts. He warned that unreliable ballot marking devices could make recounts a little more than security theater. Those are his words: “security theater.”
That’s a little devastating to the trust in the republic and our vote. Because here’s the truth: Republics don’t crash when one side loses. Republics collapse when half the country believes the referee is unreliable, and that’s what’s happening. We don’t believe the referee.
This is why the position of Pam Bondi is so important and she seems to be doing a good job on this one because historically, in 1876, we just recovered from the Civil War and we almost lost the Union post-Civil War. Tammany Hall, New York, operated on ballot manipulation.
Reformers came in and they forced structural transparency because it was all garbage, all of it, and everybody knew it. Nations in Latin America and Eastern Europe, why do they spiral out of control? Because their ballot was imperfect? No, they spiral out of control because the citizens lose faith and trust that ballots even mattered.
The flame of liberty: To have a flame, you need oxygen. Confidence is the oxygen that brings the flame of liberty to life. Without it, everything suffocates. This is why the Fulton County thing matters so much. It’s not about proving somebody right or proving somebody wrong.
It’s not about relitigating personalities. I mean, they actually said to Donald Trump, “What difference does it make? It’s not going to change the election.” No, it’s not. But we must know what happened so it doesn’t happen again. Are people this stupid? I think not.
And then I go out and I talk to some people and I’m like, “Oh my gosh, they are this stupid.” This is about answering questions completely, transparently, and publicly. If the system is sound, it needs to be proven in daylight. If procedures failed, they have to be fixed openly.
If records are missing, we need to know why they’re missing and then correct the structure or arrest the people so it can’t happen again. Because if Americans conclude that outcomes can shift without clear documentation, if chain of custody is just shrugged off as just paperwork, what difference does it matter?
If audits contradict themselves and then we’re told, “Don’t dwell on that. It’s an audit,” what do you mean don’t dwell on that? Of course I dwell on that. I have to dwell on that. It’s an audit. You imagine going into the IRS and they audit you and they come back and they say, “Your numbers aren’t right.”
And you’re like, “Don’t dwell on those numbers.” Of course, they’re going to dwell on that. It’s the numbers and math is math. And if you can’t fix those things, then elections stop being the peaceful transfer of power. And isn’t that what we’re all afraid of?
Isn’t the left afraid of that? And isn’t the right afraid of that? That one time somebody’s not going to believe the election and they’re going to seize power? You want to stop that? Then you must have an accounting on what happened in Fulton County.
Because if you don’t, it’s permanent suspicion. And once suspicion replaces consent, we’re no longer a self-governing republic. Our founders were so super smart. They did not design a system based on blind trust of officials or the government.
They, in fact, developed a system that had checks and balances everywhere. And the last check and balance is in your First Amendment. I have a right to protest. I have a right to question the government. I have a right to demand answers from the government. It’s my right. It’s the first right.
And on top of that, my religion can compel me to answer those questions. And I have a press that can ask those questions. The press is meant to question the government, not the people. All of it has to be a verifiable process. Paper trails, public counts, checks and balances.
I wanted you to hear this from me because this report came out, a 250-page report from the Election Oversight Group, and I didn’t hear an awful lot and I don’t know if people understand why this is so important. If we don’t restore confidence one way or another, then every single future election is going to be fought.
It will be fought not just at the ballot box, but in the mind of the citizens who no longer believe that the box is even secure or valid. And that is a far more dangerous place for a nation to be than anything we’re in right now. So if I hear one more person say, “What difference does it make? It’s not going to change the election,” here’s the difference.
The question is whether Americans can trust how we decide. And if we can’t answer that clearly, convincingly, and with records that we can show one another, then the damage does not belong to the Republicans. The damage does not belong to the Democrats or the independents. It belongs to the republic itself.
Taget herfra
Her er en anden artikel . Der er nogle twitters jeg ikke kan embedde
Here Are The Top 5 Takeaways From Georgia’s Suspect 2020 Election
Taget herfra
The Election Oversight Group’s 250-page report points to incidents that appear to exceed election worker incompetence and ‘clerical errors’.
M.D. Kittle
More than five years after Fulton County, Georgia, became the epicenter of suspect election administration, it appears federal law enforcement officials are taking a long overdue closer look at what really went down in the rigged 2020 election. And by the close of business Tuesday, we could get a better idea of the case the FBI made to a Georgia magistrate judge to obtain the search warrant behind its Jan. 28 raid of the Atlanta-area warehouse where county elections officials house voting records.
Judge J.P. Boulee gave the Department of Justice until 5 p.m. Tuesday to publicly disclose the affidavit justifying the FBI’s seizure of some 700 boxes of ballots, tabulator tapes, electronic ballot images, and Fulton County’s voter rolls.
Elected officials from the Democrat stronghold have expressed outrage over the raid and the federal investigation into election they insist President Donald Trump unequivocally lost to then-Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden. While that may be the case, a shadow of “irregularities” has hung over Fulton County election administration since a post-Election Day surge of unexpected ballots gave Biden enough votes to win the critical swing state. And no amount of spin from liberal voter election groups, Democrat politicians, and the usual useful idiots in corporate media has been able to cover the cloud.
‘Callous Disregard’
One thing is for certain: Fulton County elections officials are extremely anxious to get their election records back.
“Knowing that the federal government can physically seize and rummage through election records, long after the election has been certified, will predictably chill voter participation and undermine voters’ confidence in the security and secrecy of their ballots,” states an emergency motion filed on behalf of Robb Pitts, chairman of the seven-member Fulton County Board of Commissioners. He claims federal law enforcement acted with “callous disregard for Fulton County voters’ First Amendment rights.”
But what if Fulton County election officials acted with “callous disregard” for the voting rights of Georgians and their fellow Americans? What if myriad complaints, including chain-of-custody problems, missing tabulator tapes, a final vote count that defied the secretary of state’s expectations and was inconsistent with a subsequent recount and audit? Perhaps the records the FBI hauled out of that warehouse provide some answers to some critical questions that have long lingered after the lie that the Nov. 3, 2020 presidential election was “the most secure in American history” collapsed.
Perhaps there are reasons beyond claims of weaponized justice fueled by a Trump political vendetta that Fulton County officials seem so antsy to get their records back.
A report from the Election Oversight Group takes a deep dive into the many “irregularities” and inconsistencies that plagued election administration in Georgia’s most populous county in 2020.
…
As The Federalist’s Brianna Lyman reminded, the problems and questions popped up long before the general election. Fulton County, she wrote, confronted long lines and voting machine malfunctions in the primary that led even the “election denier”- alleging New York Times to describe the situation as “a full-scale meltdown.” So why should it be all that surprising that Fulton County, dealing with many thousands more ballots on Election Day, would continue to fail in overseeing the vote?
The Election Oversight Group’s 250-page report points to incidents that appear to exceed election worker incompetence and “clerical errors,” as the state’s top election official put it. Here are the top 5 findings from the investigation.
‘It Wouldn’t Probably Be Enough’
The report’s overview notes the beaming confidence of Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on the morning after the election. Appearing on the Today Show, Raffensperger said a record 4.7 million Georgia voters cast a ballot in the election. More importantly, the secretary of state said only 2 percent of the ballots remained to be counted. Trump, at that time, led Biden by nearly 104,000 votes, seemingly more than enough for a Georgia win. Raffensperger, at the time, said about 94,000 ballots had yet to be counted.
“We can see where the candidates are right now in both presidential, congressional, senatorial. When you look at how many votes are out there, even if one of the candidates got 100 percent it probably wouldn’t be enough to move it on way or another,” the elections official told the Today Show crew. He should know, the report notes. The secretary could see the numbers in real time through the state elections database.
Raffensperger added that his office would wait until everything was done.
When the dust settled, the confident secretary turned out to be very wrong. The final vote count — at least then — was an incredible 5.023 million. Between the time Fulton County’s polls closed on Election Day and the final ballot was tallied, the number of absentee ballots soared from 74,000 to more than 148,000, according to the report.
Trump went from the verge of winning a key battleground state to losing it. Just like that.
“At the time of this writing, no known explanation has been provided to justify” the surge in ballots, the report states.
Chain Trouble
The report details a significant chain of custody problem. All 148,000-plus absentee ballots that flooded into the system were “accepted and counted without first performing mandatory signature verification,” according to the review. So the documented history of more than half of those ballots can’t be established, the investigators assert. There were tens of thousands of ballots that came into the State Farm Arena on or after Election Day in “unsecured mail carts,” defying critical chain of custody requirements, the report contends.
Missing Tapes
As The Federalist reported, an attorney representing Fulton County admitted in December that county election officials failed to properly sign more than 100 “tabulator tapes”, amounting to about 315,000 votes cast during Georgia’s early-voting period. Election officials must daily note the “zero-tape” to confirm the count started fresh. Same with the “closing tapes” from ballots scanners, the record of the final vote tally for the day.
State investigators were unable to find any “zero tapes” recorded during the county’s early voting period in the 2020 general election, State Elections Board member Jan Johnston said at the board’s meeting in December.
The report on the election claims that “none of the statutorily required accounting and chain of custody records exist to support the entirety of early voting.”
Counting Conundrum
The number of absentee ballots counted doesn’t match the number of credited voters, the report notes. It draws from Fulton County and state records that show 148,318 ballots were counted in the 2020 election, although only 125,784 voters were recorded as casting an absentee ballot. That’s a difference of 22,534 votes between the absentee ballots tallied and the number of individuals given credit for voting.
“Remember: the margin between President Trump and Joe Biden was 11,779 votes…and that was the THIRD certified number and didn’t match either of the first two counts….the counties could not get their numbers to match from the first count to the second to the third…..
@GaSecofState Brad Raffensperger has NEVER explained that…,” Cleta Mitchell, election law expert and founder of the Election Integrity Network, recently posted on X.
‘Reason to Distrust the Election Outcome’
The report notes some troubling findings from a review of Fulton County’s practices and procedures in the 2020 presidential election. Election auditing specialist Philip Stark, a professor in Berkeley’s Department of Statistics, found that, while there is no indication of widespread fraud, “there is reason to distrust the election outcome.” He found the two machine counts and the manual “audit” tallies “disagree substantially,” even about the number of ballots cast.
“Some ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, were included in the original count at least twice; some were included in the machine recount at least thrice,” Stark wrote. “Moreover, most voters voted with demonstrably untrustworthy ballot-marking devices, so even a perfect handcount or audit would not necessarily reveal who really won.”
He added that “no procedure can limit that risk without a trustworthy record of the vote.”
So much for Raffensperger’s claims that “Georgia has the most secure elections in the country.” The Republican who would very much like to be Georgia’s next governor has shrugged off such concerns, insisting that “a clerical error at the end of the day does not erase valid, legal votes.”
Stark’s review raises trust issues that Raffensperger would rather voters not dwell on.
“The 2020 U.S. Presidential election in Georgia illustrates unrecoverable errors that can render recounts and audits ‘security theater’ that distract from the more serious problems rather than justifying trust,” the election audit expert wrote.
Taget herfra
Leave a Reply