FUP med Covid-“vaccinen” – det skriver Steve Kirsch om her “And we’re not the only state to have accomplished this feat. New Hampshire is the US leader vaccinating 50% more people than there are people!”
Han tør ikke skrive direkte at der er FUP involveret, men det er da den logiske konklusion !
Taget herfra
Executive summary
There’s a vaccine database kept by the CDC for each county in the US.
If you add up all the first doses administered to those over 65 in California, as of 1/4/2022, you find that 6,305,787 elderly got the shot.
There’s just one teeny weenie little problem.
The 2021 population of those over 65 in California was just 5,957,092.
So in California, we’ve vaccinated 3% more people than there are people.
And we’re not the only state where they’ve vaccinated more elderly people for COVID than there are elderly people in the state.
Florida, Maine, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Mexico, and South Dakota all were able to vaccinate more people than people.
New Hampshire sets the standard for how to roll out vaccination to the elderly giving first doses to 50% more elderly people than there are in the state
New Hampshire deserves the credit for vaccinating over 50% more elderly people in the state than there are elderly in the state (401,119 over 65 vaccinated vs. an elderly population of 267,521).
Summary
You can’t make this stuff up. You really can’t.
Surely, these states should be acknowledged for having an amazingly successful COVID vaccine program? There should be a special Biden Award for this.
Anyone can verify this.
And it looks like I’m the only one who noticed. This is what happens when you want to do linear regressions using an independent variable of the vaccination rate in each state in order to determine whether the vaccines made things better or worse.
Taget herfra
opdateret:
Taget herfra
Modsat rigtige vacciner skal de nye “vacciner” jo gives flere gange til de samme personer. Virkningen ophører åbenbart i løbet af et lille års tid. (Jeg spiser D-vitaminer i stedet for at tage stik).
Mee too, Ino.
Og end ikke forkølet siden marts, 2020.
Regionhospitalet indkaldte mig til kontroleftersyn 2022, derefter spurgte lægen om jeg ikke skulle vaccineres mod Covid-19? Nej tak, sagde jeg venligt bestemt, jeg vil ikke byde mit helbred en forsøgssprøjte som bl.a. bekæmper mit livsnødvendige immunitetsforsvar og mange andre livsfarlige skader. Lægen synes være tilfreds og fornemmede sågar et svag smil.
Rettelse: …. og udvikler mange andre livsfarlige skader og død.
Og så ska’ ALLE, HVER SOM EEN 65-ÅRIG, ha’ taget sprøjten, hvis ikke tallet i Californien i virkeligheden ska’ være langt HØJERE end de beregnede 3%.
For New Hampshire ender dét tal sikkert langt højere end tallet for reelt vaccinerede personer over 65. FLOOOT!👏👏
Næste spørgsmål:
Hvem havde incitament til at svim..svindle så groft (ja, tallene er svimlende) – og hvad var gevinsten?
Trumps stop af Gain of Function-forsøg er Super og helt på sin plads! Det er vanvittigt, at de arbejder med noget så ondt og farligt.