En appeldomstol forkaster demokratiske pseudodommeres forsøg på at lege USAs præsident ved at begrænse Trumps ret til at fyre unødvendige federale ansatte 🙂
Taget herfra
An appeals court on Friday lifted a block on President Donald Trump‘s executive orders ending federal support for diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs.
A panel of three judges ruled the orders can be enforced during a pending lawsuit, reversing a nationwide injunction from U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson in Baltimore, the Associated Press reported.
Two of the judges on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the orders “could raise concerns” about First Amendment rights, but found Abelson’s “sweeping block went too far,” according to the report.
President Donald Trump instituted sweeping policies to eradicate DEI across the federal government since taking office. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Abelson, a Biden nominee, previously ruled the orders violated the First Amendment right to free speech and were unconstitutionally “vague,” as they did not define DEI.
The ruling followed a lawsuit filed by the City of Baltimore, the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education, the American Association of University Professors and the Restaurant Opportunities Centers United, which alleged the executive orders were presidential overreach and anti-free speech.
They argued the president’s power “is not limitless.”
People march outside the office of hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman protesting his campaign against diversity, equity, and inclusion and attacks against former Harvard University President Claudine Gay in New York City, Jan. 4, 2024. (Reuters/Shannon Stapleton)
TRUMP SCORES BIG LEGAL WIN AGAINST PULITZER PRIZE BOARD MEMBERS AS LAWSUIT MOVES TO DISCOVERY
Trump’s orders directed federal agencies to terminate all “equity-related” grants or contracts, and required federal contractors to certify that they don’t promote DEI.
The administration argued in court that the ban only affected DEI programs violating federal civil rights laws.
“What’s happening is an overcorrection and pulling back on DEI statements,” attorney Aleshadye Getachew said in a hearing.
Nathaniel Dibble, a member of the Young Democratic Socialists of America at North Carolina State University, voices opposition to repealing North Carolina’s public university system’s diversity policy before the UNC Board of Governors’ vote outside the UNC system office in Raleigh, N.C., May 23, 2024. (AP Photo/Makiya Seminera)
While the president secured a win with the latest injunction, a similar federal lawsuit was filed in D.C. U.S. District Court on Wednesday challenging DEI executive orders including: “Ending Radical and Wasteful DEI Programs and Preferencing;” “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government;” and “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The second complaint was filed by NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Lambda Legal on behalf of nonprofit advocacy organizations.
White House spokesman Harrison Fields told the New York Times that “the radical leftists can either choose to swim against the tide and reject the overwhelming will of the people, or they can get on board and work with President Trump to advance his wildly popular agenda.”
Fox News Digital’s Brie Stimson, Danielle Wallace, and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Taget herfra
Det siger sig selv at når demokrati-parti præsidenter som Obama og Biden via dekreter kan gennemføre DEI/LGBT bestemmelser, så kan republikansle præsidenter som Trump også ophæve den slags vanvid !
USAs største problem er efterhånden de MANGE pseudodommere , næsten altid udpeget af det demokratiske parti, der ulovligt tiltager sig ret til at lege præsident af USA
Problemet er at det ALDRIG får nogle konsekvenser for de magtgale pseudodommere.
De burde fyres, når en appelret/Højesteret bestemmer at de har overtrådt deres kompetence !
Eller i det mindste straffes på deres egen lønseddel, så de lærer ikke at misbruge deres legale autoritet på den udøvende autoritet …
Her er et andet eksempel på en “dommer”, som er HELT ude af trit med den amerikanske befolkning :
Taget herfra
Mage til SPILD af skatte $ skal man da lede længe efter
Jeg kunne godt tænke mig at den dummer, når nej “dommer” blev sat i celle med den forbryder i bare 2 dage …
Så kunne det være – jeg er ikke sikker 🙂 – at dummeren lærte noget …
De fleste af de “demokratiske” dommere er jo købt og betalt af Soros…
Der kan klages over dommerne til den lokale “bar”, desværre er det sådan at disse dommere oftest har deres stillinger i demokratisk ledede stater, hvor hele retssystemet er domineret af partitro folk, så dem der skal tage stilling til hvorvidt en dommer kan fortsætte eller ej, er oftest på linje med dommeren.
Når der er tale om føderale dommere, er det DOJ som skal rejse tiltale (impeachment) mod dem og Pam Bondi har sagt at hun er villig til at gøre det, men vi venter stadig på at hun holder ord.