Senatskommitteens særlige undersøger Rachel Mitchell skyder Christine Fords vidneudsagn ned

Noting the obvious, Mitchell wrote that a “‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that. Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them….I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”

Mitchell listed several reasons for that conclusion.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqkbwL_m49I]

Stefan Molyneuxgennemgår rapporten punkt for punkt:

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGBIMU__nmM]

IS DR FORD DEEPLY TIED TO CIA?

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky1GJgt1GNg]

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Din email adresse vil ikke blive vist offentligt.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.