Det ser ud til at Trump har lært hvor vigtigt det er at standse de pseudorådgivere/bureaukrater og skuerets”dommere” der tror de er enerådende konger som aldrig behøver at erklære sig ikke-uhildede dohj, så de ikke kan hindre den amerikanske præsident i at udføre sin lovlige politik …
Taget herfra
In a decisive and not-so-surprising move, President Donald Trump has ordered the termination of all remaining U.S. attorneys from the Biden administration.
Trump made the announcement in a post on Truth Social, which captures the essence of his belief that restoring integrity to the justice system is paramount for America’s resurgence: “Over the past four years, the Department of Justice has been politicized like never before. Therefore, I have instructed the termination of ALL remaining ‘Biden Era’ U.S. Attorneys. We must ‘clean house’ IMMEDIATELY, and restore confidence. America’s Golden Age must have a fair Justice System – THAT BEGINS TODAY!”
My only question is: what took him so long?
The recent termination notices sent to several Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys underscore a broader narrative that many in the GOP have long championed: the belief that the Justice Department has become a tool wielded by the left, aiming to undermine political opponents rather than uphold the rule of law. The Biden administration repeatedly weaponized the Justice Department against Trump in a blatant attempt to prevent his return to office.
Related: Here’s Why Trump’s Border Czar Is Threatening to Put FBI Agents in Jail
Of course, purging U.S. attorneys from the previous administration is a standard practice, but you can bet Democrats will find a way to scandalize this move. And here’s how they’ll do it. The typical protocol when a new administration comes into power is that they request the resignations of U.S. attorneys being replaced, but not under the heavy hammer of termination letters. The outcome may be no different, but somehow I suspect Democrats will find a way to make this the latest “constitutional crisis.”
Just days after taking office, Trump swiftly fired several federal prosecutors involved in cases related to his handling of classified documents, which, of course drew the ire of Democrats. But, let’s face it, it had to be done.
Fox News Digital has more:
Days after taking office, Trump fired several career federal prosecutors involved in cases against him. The employees worked on special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation against Trump over his handling of classified documents and efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss.
Smith resigned before Trump took office.
During the 2024 presidential election, Trump accused the Biden administration of weaponizing the Justice Department against him in an effort to knock him out of the race. He campaigned on a promise to restore the agency.
“We’re going through this weaponization of our government to try and knock out somebody’s political opponent,” Trump said in March 2024, calling all the cases against him the “Biden trials.”
Most recently, Trump ordered the DOJ to drop a case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who was facing corruption charges, prompting acting U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon, and five other staffers to resign rather than carry out the directive.
The implications of Trump’s latest moves reach far beyond personnel changes; they indicate a profound desire to realign the Justice Department with the rule of law, which was sadly abandoned under Democrat administrations.
Taget herfra
Won’t Get Fooled Again: GOP Moves to Impeach Judges Trying to Stop Trump Agenda
Det skriver Victoria Taft her
Taget herfra
Even Margaret Brennan probably knows that an activist district judge in a Rhode Island backwater can’t stop a president from conducting his Article II powers. And so, this time, congressional Republicans aren’t falling for black robe tricknology and are moving to impeach two judges whose hackneyed and conflicted rulings have temporarily stopped President Trump’s agenda.
Trump has vowed to obey their rulings until these decisions are inevitably overturned, if not by garden-variety federal appeals courts, then by the U.S. Supreme Court. Someday.
In an effort to stop the judicial clown show, the GOP wants to make a point that an activist Democrat judge who can’t write an understandable order has no business on the federal bench. It also wants to make the point that a judge who helps oversee his own NGO shouldn’t be making decisions about President Trump halting payments to NGOs. Seems reasonable.
GOP congressional representatives have made moves to impeach two judges who ruled to halt President Donald Trump’s agenda. The overseers of this judicial interference are Norm Eisen, the man who brought you the Letitia James New York lawfare show that got boffo finger snaps by the Broadway left, and Andrew Weissmann, who was in charge of the baseless Russia! Russia! Russia! lawfare against Trump. Both sit on the MSNBC court of clowns.
Matt’s excellent column about this “judicial oligarchy,” notes that, “U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer… has barred members of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and even the Treasury secretary from accessing crucial payment and data systems—another blatant example of the judiciary eroding executive authority on behalf of the resistance.”
Recommended: Margaret, Everyone in This Country Is Now Dumber for Having Listened to You
Engelmayer’s decision isn’t a crazy judicial opinion or anything.
Legal analyst Margot Cleveland says that even before one even gets to Judge Engelmayer’s poorly reasoned temporary restraining order, the case brought by 14 Democrat state attorneys general has a “fatal flaw.”
By her reckoning, the plaintiffs “utterly lack standing to challenge DOGE and the Treasury Department’s decision to grant read-only access to select members of that executive agency’s team. And without standing, there is no basis to bring a lawsuit, much less to justify the TRO,” she told Fox News Digital. Gee, that seems like it might be a problem.
See Murthy v. Missouri for how important “standing” is.
Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.) will introduce articles of impeachment against Engelmayer.
Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) is bringing impeachment charges against Rhode Island Federal District Court Judge John McConnell, who ruled on a case involving cutting spending.
It turns out that the Obama-appointed judge’s Democrat activist record is in good standing with stints at the morally bankrupt Planned Parenthood and the Southern Poverty Law Center. Plus, and this is controlling in this argument, the good judge ran his own NGO called Crossroads Rhode Island. He now sits on its board of directors where they count all the money from the feds.
America First Legal counted it too. The NGO raked in $128 million over the past 18 years.
Apparently, this obvious conflict of interest wasn’t divulged by the judge.
Taget herfra
her er en af de pseudo-konge-dommere, der tror at de har ret til at bestemme over hvem præsidenten kan fyre:
Taget herfra
Leave a Reply