Fox News har denne video om the Biden Crime Family
Kilde: JL
opdateret:
Mike Huckabee skriver her at FBI nu er AFSLØRET i at sløre ( overmale med sort) oplysninger, som INTET har med at gøre FBIs kilder /metoder.
Med andre ord: FBI manipulerer det materiale, FBI er TVINGET til at fremvise
F.eks. ville FBI IKKE have at amerikanere skulle se at Burisma sagde at Hunter Biden var dummere end hans hund ! Det har jo INTET at gøre med “Sources/Methods”, som FBI påstod var årsagen til at sortmale det 🙁
Her er et klip fra en artikel, som jeg har fået tilsendt, fordi jeg abbonerer på Mike Huckabee :
“BUSTED! FBI caught in lie about purpose of redactions
We’ll have much more about the government’s “special handling” of the Hunter Biden case on Monday, leading into former business partner Devon Archer’s testimony next week. But in the meantime, Miranda Devine at the NEW YORK POST, credited with breaking the original Hunter laptop story in October 2020, has noticed something peculiar about certain redactions in that compelling FBI “1023.”
It proves we’ve been right all along in our suspicions that redactions aren’t necessarily made to protect “sources and methods” or safeguard national security, even though the FBI tells us they are. Now we know they can be made for extremely subjective reasons that have nothing at all to do with these concerns. Once again, the FBI has humiliated itself.
Recall that Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley’s receipt of that document, which contains detailed notes from the 2020 interview of an FBI confidential human source (CHS), was the culmination of months of negotiation with the Bureau. The first version the FBI released to Sen. Grassley was, he estimated, 30 percent redacted. But as negotiations continued, most of those black bars were lifted. So, by comparing the first version to the final version, it’s possible to see what the FBI’s original redactions were.
Miranda Devine unleashed a hilarious tweet about this: “Well done, @Chuck Grassley. Now everyone can read for ourselves what the FBI tried to hide. Question: why did the FBI try to redact the line where Zlochevsky says his dog is smarter than Hunter? How is that protecting “sources and methods”?
Also this: “Here’s the document, mostly unredacted. [We linked to that final version of it in yesterday’s newsletter.] But the document grudgingly shown to House Oversight chairman James Comer last month had a whole lot of gratuitous redactions.”
What does Zlochevsky’s comically low assessment of Hunter Biden’s intelligence have to do with national security, or the protection of the FBI’s “sources and methods”? Not a thing. It’s part of the story, not just an entertaining part but actually an important part, because it shows that there was no reason to hire Hunter for a lucrative position on Burisma’s board other than his father’s Vice-Presidential clout.
And it’s the kind of detail that can quickly make its way around social media. The Democrats wouldn’t like that, but we hope it does. We hope the phrase “dumber than Zlochevsky’s dog” enters the lexicon as a fun way to talk about stupid people who still manage to reach high places. In fact, we plan to start using it here in the Huckabee newsletter. It’s descriptive along the same lines as “dumb as a box of rocks,” but more specific and definitely timely.
It’s probably safe to say that President Biden himself is dumber than Zlochevsky’s dog. They both are smart enough to respond to simple commands, such as “shake hands,” but neither is smart enough to understand why it’s inappropriate to sniff young girls. They both read a teleprompter equally well. But Zlochevsky’s dog surely can find his way off a podium more easily than Biden can.
I digress. Another point about this: knowing what was redacted now is making us wonder what else in that “1023” is STILL redacted. Are those last few black bars really there for national security purposes, or are they just hiding bits of information that makes some member of the Biden family look bad?
Devine also co-authored a very interesting report about the influence wielded by President Biden’s sister, Valerie Biden Owens, Hunter’s “Aunt Val.” IRS whistleblower #2, Joseph Ziegler, testified behind closed doors last month before the House Ways & Means Committee that he’d repeatedly asked to interview her about a payment from Hunter she’d received via Venmo. But any attempt to interview Biden family members was, he claimed, blocked by prosecutors.
We don’t know the amount of that payment. But it would be interesting, because according to Devine, Valerie has a “powerful place at the heart of the Biden’s family and political operation.” She earned the nickname “Hurricane” and even used that as one of her email addresses. Reportedly she was skilled at smoothing things over with staff when Joe’s temper got the better of him.
“She was never part of Joe’s strategic team,” a former White House aide told the POST. “But she is his final gut check.” She’s not sitting right there in the Oval Office with him, the source said, but “they’re best friends and the President values her opinion.” She’s managed his political campaigns since he first entered politics, many, many…many…years ago.
The POST reports that emails from Hunter’s laptop “show Biden Owens as the final arbiter and micromanager on everything that has to do with her brother and the Biden family.” And with her “central role orchestrating the family,” she worked to raise money for their many causes. She even chairs the Joseph R. Biden Jr. Institute of Public Policy and Administration at the University of Delaware.
This enthusiastic woman apparently has had her brother’s complete trust, all these many years. You’d think such a closely involved relative — who had received a payment from Hunter — would naturally have been interviewed by the FBI. But according to whistleblower Ziegler, that was not in the cards.
https://nypost.com/2023/07/21/the-influence-of-valerie-biden-owensjoes-final-gut-check
Finally, when Jesse Watters interviewed former FBI agent Stuart Kaplan Friday evening, they touched on something we’ve been wondering about: where ARE those 17 recordings that Zlochevsky allegedly said he’d made of conversations with Hunter and Joe Biden, the ones that were supposed to show that Zlochevsky had been “coerced” to give them $5 million each? If these were real, what mad dash has been going on behind the scenes to retrieve them — with the goal either of exposing them or preventing them from being exposed?
FOX NEWS didn’t put the Kaplan interview in a separate clip on their website, but here’s the entire opening segment of the show; the interview starts about 10 minutes in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=1tBf4ptHKHY
When Jesse asks what might have happened to the “tapes” (probably not magnetic tapes but digital recordings), Kaplan says this: “Let me put it succinctly and based upon facts. There is no doubt that the FBI continue to conduct an investigation to ascertain and locate and try to retrieve those recordings. You can take that to the bank…[I] can tell you that the FBI did do that.”
But if the recordings were obtained and then buried or destroyed, he said, “that would be something that would be so hard for me to wrap my head around, ‘cause that would then bring the end to the FBI.” And after seeing what he has seen, he doesn’t put it past them. “It would not surprise me that the agents were able to locate and track down those recordings, and make those recordings disappear, or got those recordings and we will never, ever see them in the light of day.”
Her er, hvad FBI er idag:
Se mere her
Leave a Reply