“EU Climate Scam Exposed: IPCC Admits Doomsday Scenario Was “Implausible” Garbage – But Brussels Refuses to Scrap a SINGLE Regulation Built on the Lie”

“The House of the Great Climate Scam is collapsing. The United Nations’ own climate priesthood has finally admitted what skeptics have screamed for years: their favorite apocalyptic scenario, RCP8.5 – the one predicting civilization-ending warming, floods, fires, and famines unless we destroy our economies with Green New Deals – is “implausible.” Fake. Junk science sold as gospel.”

Taget herfra

But here’s the real bombshell the fake news won’t touch: The European Union, that bloated bureaucratic beast strangling its citizens with Net Zero madness, hasn’t pulled even one document, “scientific” report, regulation, or taxpayer-funded scare tactic based on this now-discredited fairy tale. Not a single one. Trillions in subsidies, destroyed industries, skyrocketing energy bills, and farmers rioting in the streets – all propped up on a foundation of lies.

The Big Lie That Powered the Green Grift

For over a decade, EU apparatchiks at the European Environment Agency (EEA), Joint Research Centre (JRC), Climate-ADAPT, and even the European Central Bank leaned hard on RCP8.5 as their “high-emissions” nightmare fuel. Sea-level rise maps? RCP8.5. Extreme fire weather? RCP8.5. Heatwaves, droughts, flooding Armageddon? All RCP8.5. The PESETA projects hammering agriculture, coasts, energy, and tourism? Straight out of the RCP8.5 playbook. Bank stress tests? You guessed it.

These “experts” hyped impossible futures – all to justify the European Green Deal, Fit for 55 insanity, carbon taxes, EV mandates, heating bans, and deindustrialization that’s gutting Europe. Roger Pielke Jr. nailed it: These scenarios produced “impossible futures” that dominated policy anyway.

Now the IPCC’s scenario team is quietly retiring RCP8.5/SSP5-8.5 for the next assessment round because it’s detached from reality. Even they can’t pretend anymore.

EU Spin Meets Brutal Reality: Everything They Said Was Wrong

Brussels’ climate cultists are scrambling. They claim RCP8.5 can be “retired” thanks to the glorious march of renewables (wind and solar, of course) and policy “progress.” Pure fantasy. Record CO2 emissions: The world pumped out more fossil fuel CO2 than ever in 2025 – another all-time high, with 2026 trending the same. Global emissions keep climbing. China, India, and the rest of the world aren’t playing the suicide game.

Renewables (sun & wind)? A pathetic 3% of primary energy. Not only electricity – primary energy, the stuff that actually powers civilization. Wind and solar as a substitute to fossile fuels and nuclear are intermittent jokes. Their real system costs – backup, grid overhauls, distribution nightmares – make them the most expensive energy sources on the planet. They aren’t “displacing” fossil fuels at scale. They’re expensive add-ons.

The EU’s own data and global stats confirm it: The “renewable revolution” is a subsidy-sucking mirage. Emissions are still rising. The world is not on the low-carbon path these models assumed. RCP8.5 wasn’t killed by green virtue – it was always detached from how humans actually use energy.

Yet the EU’s regulatory edifice stands untouched

Every impact assessment, every adaptation plan, every scare-mongering communication citing this garbage remains official gospel. Why? Because admitting the fraud would mean repealing the Green Deal, admitting they wrecked livelihoods for nothing, and facing the rage of voters already freezing in the dark and paying through the nose.

This Is the Greatest Policy Fraud in History

Think about it: Trillions wasted. Energy poverty exploding across Europe. Industries fleeing to places that laugh at Net Zero. Farmers blockading roads because they can’t compete with insane regulations rooted in debunked models. And the “experts” who peddled this? Still cashing checks, still demanding more power, still smearing skeptics as “deniers.” Senior EU officials are so unhinged they’re assaulting scientists who dare speak the truth. That’s not science – that’s a cult.

Alarmist Porn

The Gateway Pundit has been exposing this grift for years. The IPCC just handed us the receipts. RCP8.5 was never a plausible baseline – it was alarmist porn to scare politicians into surrendering sovereignty and wealth to Brussels and the UN.Europe deserves better. Citizens deserve refunds. Industries deserve relief. And the EU bureaucracy deserves a reckoning.

Time to scrap the entire Net Zero house of cards built on this fraud. Before it bankrupts Europe, tomorrow the USA? The “implausible” scenario is dead. The policies built on it? Still very much alive – and killing. Wake up.

Taget herfra

9 Kommentarer

  1. DR.TV havde inviteret direktøren for Vestas i studiet forleden dag, hvor han belærte pøblen om, at vi snart “løber tør” for strøm, hvis vi ikke straks bygger nogle flere vindmøller og jernmarker.
    Gætter på at tossen selv bor i whiskybæltet i Nordsjælland, hvor der ikke findes en eneste vindmølle i miles omkreds.

    • WHAT a surprise direkøteren for “Vestas” mener, vi skal købe flere vindmøller!
      – Gerne “Vestas” vindmøller – vil jeg tro.
      Dét er jo ikke viden.
      Dét er et kræmmermerkantilt PARTSINDLÆG😆

      Men, sikken da også en “solstrålehistorie” at denne STORE klimaLØGN har kunnet gøre den lille fedtede politiske nulbon Al GoreTEX “And The Climate Show” til milliardær!
      Hér ka’ vi virkelig tale om VIND i sejlene😂
      HUR-RRA!!🤮

    • Der er i hvert fald ikke en vindmølle at se her i Rudersdal, og i mit smukke sommerhusland på Bjärehalvøen i Skåne er der heller ingen. Men på Kullenhalvøen har jeg udsigt til fem møller – vindsnurror på svensk.

    • En “jernmark” vil leverer strøm i +25 år, hvilket giver tid nok, til at implementerer A-kraft.

  2. Bregentved gods (såvidt jeg husker) fik godkendelse til bygning af en jernmark ved Karise, det gik også fint, men man havde glemt at strømmen også skulle transporteres væk. Det var der ikke kapacitet til, ledningsnettet var for småt og ringe😁🤪

  3. Mht ikke-fornybare resurcer kul, olie, metaller mv er det ikke kun de lavesthængende frugter, der allerede er plukket; der er faktisk kun de øverste i toppen tilbage, som vi så må slås med fuglene om.
    En af flaskehalsene er sølv og kobber, for disse er essentielle for Den Grønne Bølge af fornybar energi.
    Men da mange lande har fravalgt/nedlagt A-kraft, er vi nød til at udbygge alternativ energi, hvis vi altså vil bevare den tekniske civilation!

    CO2 er ganske underordnet.

  4. Storbrugere af el bør etablere deres egne kraftværker i forbindelse med det sted, hvor de forbruger el. Gerne med gas som brændstof.

    Så skal elnettet ikke udbygges. Grøn omstilling = rød omstilling.

Leave a Reply

Din email adresse vil ikke blive vist offentligt.


*


Dette site anvender Akismet til at reducere spam. Læs om hvordan din kommentar bliver behandlet.