FN har udviklet sig til at være en jødehadende kloak og næsten alle vestlige demokratier siger ja og amen

ICC = International Clown Circus har besluttet at udstede arresteordrer mod to demokratiske valgte israelske ledere Bibi Netanyahu og Ganz for … krigsforbrydelser. Som i Dreyfuss Affæren i Frankrig i 1894 er anklagerne selvfølgelig hemmelige for ikke at afsløre at kejseren ikke har nogen klæder på

“The decision to issue an arrest warrant against the prime minister was made by a corrupt chief prosecutor who is trying to save himself from sexual harassment accusations and biased judges who are motivated by antisemitic hatred of Israel.

“The ICC prosecutor lied when he told American senators that he would take no action until he had visited Israel and heard its side.

Instead, he canceled his arrival in Israel last May, several days after suspicions of sexual harassment were made against him, and announced his intention to issue arrest warrants against the prime minister and former defense minister.”

Taget herfra

Kun 1-2 dage efter en klart partisk resolution i FN sikkerhedsråd blev vetoet af USA , mens alle andre i sikkerhedsrådet incl UK og Frankrig stemte for, kommer ICC nu med latterlige anklager mod Israel for krigsforbrydelser i Gaza

For at vise hvor “neutrale” ICC er, har de også udstedt en arrestordre på en hamas-terrorist Deif, som IDF for mange måneder siden har ekspederet op til de 72 jomfruer

Men ICC ventede altså over 13 måneder med at reagere mod hamas terroristernes pogrom den 7 oktober 2023, hvor hamas terrorister myrdede over 1200 israelere og tog over 255 som gidsler.

Men til gengæld anklagede ICC ofret, der forsvarede sig mod angrebet den 7 oktober ..

Imponerede, ikke sandt ?

Hamas har da også sagt tak til ICC for det :

Taget herfra

Det gør Iran også …

I alle krige rammes civilbefolkningen i større eller mindre grad. USA har i deres krig i Irak og Afghanistan IKKE været under forholdet 1:9, altså for hver fjendtlig person var der minst 9 civile dræbt

Jeg kender ikke det tilsvarende tal for Ruslands invasion i Ukraine, men må være mange gange de 9, som USA havde

Næsten alle militære vestlige kilder, som har undersøgt IDF i Gaza, har konkluderet at IDF har opnået det fantastisk lave tal 1:1-2, med andre ord mellem 1 og 2 civile pr dræbt terrorist.

INGEN anden stat har opnået så lave civile tabtal , så når ICC nu overfalder Israel, er det blot seneste overfald fra politisk hold – det har intet med jura eller retfærdighed at gøre

IDFs lave tal er opnået PÅ TRODS AF at hamas altid gemmer bag civile, som så rammes, når Israel helt lovligt angriber hamas.

Inden da har IDF advaret civibefolkningen og dermed også hamas om i hvilket område næste angreb sker. IDF har altså opgivet overraskelsesmomentet for at redde civile …

IDF har distribueret flyveblade over Gaza med den slags oplysninger om hvor man vil angribe

IDF har ringet til de civile i området, som havde telefon og advaret dem

Og alligevel tillader ICC – international CLOWN CIRCUS sig at angribe Israel for krigsforbrydelser …

Israel behandles mao ord HELT anderledes end andre lande i krigssituationer som Irak , Afghanistan, ukraine, Sudan og de mange andre steder, hvor der er krig og hvor ICC intet gjorde

Den slags adfærd er klart antisemitisk, altså jødefjendsk …

her er et par videoer om det

Det mest bekymrende er ikke antisemitterne i FN .

Det er den ynkelige reaktion fra vestlige demokratiske lande, som burde stå last og brast med den demokratiske Israel, men i stedet – for næsten alles vedkommende – blot lader som om at ICC har noget med jura og eller moral at gøre 🙁

Tænk hvis alle vestlige lande havde reageret ved at fortælle antisemitterne i ICC at de IKKE ville efterfølge den KLART POLITISKE afgørelse og ville trække sig ud af ICC samarbejdet hvis den slags politisk forfølgelse skete igen.

Så kan det være at FN/ICC ikke var helt så antisemitisk som før !

I stedet for sidder næsten alle vatpikke i EU mf og fletter fingre og lader som om FN/ICC er neutrale

Det sker selvfølgelig også for vatpikken i Danmark, fadbamsen, som ALTID vil efterkomme umoralske krav fra antisemitterne i FN frem for at vise lidt moralsk rygrad og stemme imod de evige fordømmelse mod Israel

Men det kræver jo man har en rygrad – og det savnes i uhyggelig grad i vestlige lande 🙁

Gid fanden havde FN !

Her er en god artikel af Bernard-Henri Lévy : There Is No ‘Genocide’ in Gaza

Taget herfra

I have “studied” these subjects in depth. I have seen genocides in Srebrenica and Darfur with my own eyes. I have filmed those tortured by Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and the bodies burned alive, thrown from rooftops, beheaded, by ISIS at Mosul. I have documented, on the ground, the indiscriminate killings by Russia in Ukraine.

I covered, long before that, the carnage of the Islamic Salvation Front in Algeria, from which the French writer Kamel Daoud escaped. I have borne witness to those survivors in the Christian villages of the Middle Belt of Nigeria, their lives decimated by the Islamist Fulani.

In short, I know what it means to be promised death. I have seen skeletons exploited to their last strength and, when that strength expired, thrown into a pit. In other words, I know what genocide and crimes against humanity mean.

The world has willingly forgotten that, in this war of Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran and its puppets, the IDF is the first army in the world to take so many measures, sometimes to its strategic detriment, to ensure that as few innocent civilians as possible are caught in the furnace of battles.

Thus, myths are forged.

Thus, we go from the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy, or Judeo-Bolshevik, or Judeo-Capitalist conspiracy, to the Judeo-genocidal conspiracy of which all the Jews of the world would be more or less complicit. And thus we insult, not only the truth of facts and names, but the holy memory of the victims of the genocides of the last century. BERNARD-HENRI LÉVY

Unsanction Israel

President Biden’s sanctions regime against Israelis “for undermining peace, security, and stability in the West Bank” violates several standards of sanctions policy. America almost never sanctions other democracies. Americans respect the desire of other self-governing peoples to govern themselves, rather than to obey coercive dictates from Washington. If America cannot peacefully persuade another democracy to change its ways, America lives with it.

America sanctions rogue states and non-state groups that brutalize people lacking recourse to courts or democratic institutions. Think China, Russia, Iran, North Korea. Or the terror groups and states within states in Yemen and Sudan.

American sanctions policy now classes Israel with the world’s worst regimes, including Iran, a state sponsor of terror officially dedicated to Israel’s destruction. Actually, American sanctions now treat Israel worse than Iran: by targeting the speech of its citizens. Sanctioning Israel in wartime also advances the best hope of Israel’s enemies – to isolate Israel from its friends.

Moreover, the sanctions regime the administration has set up grossly misidentifies the culprit. West Bank Palestinians have committed hundreds of terrorist attacks and killed at least 20 Israelis since Oct. 7, 2023. Nearly all alleged incidents of West Bank Jews committing violence against Arabs involve property crimes.

Settler violence is so infrequent that the Biden administration has struggled to find perpetrators to sanction. Instead, it has sanctioned persons never accused of violence or already dealt with by the Israeli authorities. Meanwhile, endemic Palestinian property crimes against Jews remain under-prosecuted by Israel, ignored or encouraged by the Palestinian Authority, and unsanctioned by America.

At a recent Israeli parliament meeting, both opponents and supporters of the Netanyahu government condemned the sanctions regime. Americans should join with Israelis in opposing this intervention in Israeli public life – to protect their own free-speech rights and to support an American security partner.

State Department’s last-gasp effort to sabotage an Israeli victory over terrorists

Israel’s detractors believe that America’s unwavering support for Israel is driven by the mythologically omnipotent “Jewish lobby.” The truth is it is the Arab lobby, entrenched within the deep state, which has been adversely affecting U.S. policy since the discovery of oil in Saudi Arabia in the 1930s.

The Arabists fought first to prevent the establishment of Israel, then to strangle the nascent state at birth, and ever since, have sought to drive a wedge between the two countries despite their shared values and interests. This tradition has continued in the Biden administration, where the Arabists are determined to make a last stand before Donald Trump takes office and make their anti-Israel positions as Trump-proof as possible.

We have seen this movie before.

In the 1940s, President Harry Truman’s push for the creation of Israel was met with fierce resistance. The Arabists in the State and Defense Departments were adamantly against the establishment of a Jewish state, fearing the United States would lose access to Middle East oil (which we did not yet depend on), that Israel would be Communist, and that the Soviets would exploit Arab anger with America to gain influence in the region. Truman ordered them to support partition; however, after the resolution to create a Jewish and Arab state was adopted, American diplomats tried to prevent its implementation. The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations announced that partition was unworkable and proposed an international trusteeship for Palestine instead. Truman learned about it from the newspaper. Historian Robert Silverberg said Truman “became a staunch Zionist for the first time” and ensured that he would no longer listen to “the appeasers of the Arabs, the worriers over oil, the frenetic anti-Communists and the subtle anti-Semites in the Departments of State and Defense.”

The Arabists have never given up.

We saw President Barack Obama’s Arabist instrument, John Kerry, sticking it to Israel as he headed out the door in a preemptive strike against the incoming Trump administration. As I wrote at the time, he and Hillary Clinton “carried out President Obama’s agenda to turn on our most fervent allies, such as Israel, make catastrophic deals with enemies such as Iran and, in a nod to Nero, fiddled while Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya and Yemen burned.”

After the failure of Kerry’s efforts to broker peace between Israel and the Palestinians, and Trump defeated Clinton, Obama ordered the United States to abstain rather than veto Security Council Resolution 2334, a one-sided measure labeling Israeli settlements “a flagrant violation of international law” that damage the prospects of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Obama had previously vetoed a similar resolution but now claimed the vote reflected longstanding U.S. policy.

The US media’s war on Trump’s Middle East policy

In recent articles on Hezbollah’s rocket attacks on northern Israel, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal all referred to the “Israeli-occupied” or “Israeli-controlled” Golan Heights. The terms were revealing. In March 2019, President Trump recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan, making it an indivisible part of the Jewish state. In describing the Heights as “occupied” and “controlled” by Israel, America’s papers of record were publicly rejecting the position of the country’s democratically elected leader in favor of those of Belgium, China, and the Obama administration.

The willingness of the mainstream press to make its own foreign policy signals a deeply troubling trend. Presidents often rescind their predecessors’ decisions. George Bush and Donald Trump withdrew America’s representation on the flagrantly anti-Israel UN Human Rights Council and Barack Obama and Joe Biden restored it. Trump nullified Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran and Biden tried to revive it. But the negation by the and large parts of the public of a formal White House policy poses far greater challenges. More than Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, at stake is the legitimacy of presidential decisions.

Those challenges will certainly mount under the incoming administration. Much of the controversy will center, once again, on the Middle East. President Trump has selected Secretaries of State and Defense, a National Security Advisor, and ambassadors to Israel and the UN, whose outlook on the region sharply diverges from that of the previous policymakers. While the Biden administration sought to limit Israel’s ability to defend itself, condemned Israeli settlement-building in the West Bank, and supported the creation of a Palestinian state that the vast majority of Israelis opposed, the Trump team believes that Israel should fight as it sees fit, calls the settlements communities and the West Bank by its Biblical name, Judea and Samaria. And though President Trump’s 2020 peace plan provided for a Palestinian state, those soon to be forging US foreign policy will undoubtedly oppose the establishment of any Palestinian entity bound to quickly fail and fall to Hamas. The Biden White House refused to stand up to Iran in any significant way and tried to appease it back to the negotiating table. In complete contrast, Trump’s senior staff will work to thoroughly isolate and weaken Iran. Should it ever come back to the table, it will do so begging for a deal.

All of this, of course, is good news for the majority of Israelis. Many dubbed Trump’s selection of Secretary Marco Rubio, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, and Ambassadors Elise Stefanik and Mike Huckabee, the “Dream Team.” The Iranian regime promptly told that team it was no longer planning to attack Israel and was willing to negotiate with Trump. The restoration of trust in the relations between the United States and Israel, and fear among our common enemies, holds out the promise of unprecedented stability in the Middle East, the conclusion of wars, and the expansion of existing peace treaties. But will it last?

Taget herfra

12 Kommentarer

  1. Det er en syyygverden, og jeg er spændt på, hvad den bette fadbumz siger, for han blev jo indkaldt til hastemøde om det her. Han gør altid sammen med de store køtere, men hvad gør han nu, hvor USA nedlagde veto mod det her?? Sidder han og bæller fadbamser?
    Tænk sig lige, at der er folk, der mener, at 7 oktober var et ‘false flag’!? Det er så hjernelamt. Vedkommende, en blogger, skrev og henviste til en antisemitisk video, hvor der “blev sagt noget om, at det var false flag”. Jammen, når nogen på en video SIGER det, så må det da være sandt? 🙄🙄 Sådan tænkte nazi-tyskerne det også, da Hitler i radioen sagde, at jøder stod for sygdom og blev rige på bekostning af fattige tyskere… Det kaldes hjernevask og propaganda.

  2. Han siger, at Bibi skal ‘efterforskes’!? Hvilken fej type! Jeg beskæmmes og væmmes! Nu har Paraguay også taget standpunkt og støtter Israel. Den lille bananrepublik Danmark er en samling af kujoner!

    • Det er helt i orden at efterforske, men Danmark burde tage afstand til udstedelsen af en arrestordre inden der har fundet nogen efterforskning sted.

      Hvis vi havde en regering med mandsmod og rygrad, udstedte de en arrestordre på alle ansatte ved ICC, for at hjælpe og støtte terrorister.

  3. ICC må under ingen omstændigheder blive taget alvorligt. DET ER SYGDLIGT PERVERST AF ICC, AT KALDE ISRAELSK KRIGSFØRSEL I GAZA FOR FOLKEMORD. …De må da gerne undersøge det herfra til helvede, hvis de vil det. …men så sandelig skal der ingen arrestordre udstedes. Hvad med Ruslands angreb på Ukraine? Hvad med Kina? Syrien? Yemen etc etc. Men israel, som advare civilbefolkni gen og indsætter fødevarenødhjælp etc. ICC kan gå af helvede til….( sammen med enhedslisten:-)).
    Støt friheden og demokratiet. Støt Israel.

  4. Der er desværre ikke mange, der vil anerkende at Rusland havde til hensigt at beskytte russere i Ukraine. I vore dage er man skyldig hvis man anklages. Det er set før i historien. Intet nyt her. Og folk kalder sig selv for oplyste. Dybt suk.

  5. Der har været skumle aktører og hensigter til stede i alle lande til alle tider. Vores problemer opstår som regel når slynglerne påberåber sig dyden, som vi ser det med Keir Starmer, EU og venstrefløjen i Danmark.

  6. Jeg glæder mig til arrestordre kommer ud mod Anders Fogh Rasmussen og det meste af det danske folketing for krige i Irak, Afganistan og Nordafrika. Derudover arrestordre mod Bush junior, Obama, Blair og resten af de vestlige krigsforbrydere.

    Men derudover, mon ikke Israel har godt styr på det juridiske aspekt i diverse militære operationer og har det hele vel dokumenteret.

  7. Som sædvanlig repræsenterer Orban den eneste fornuftige stemme i EU – Orban nægter at efterkomme arrestordren, og har tilgengæld inviteret Netanyahu på besøg i Ungarn.

Leave a Reply

Din email adresse vil ikke blive vist offentligt.


*


Dette site anvender Akismet til at reducere spam. Læs om hvordan din kommentar bliver behandlet.