“Godt Nytår”

Lars Hedegaard her om “mean”-stream-medierne, som amerikanerne ikke længere tror på, men de har jo også alternativer som Fox, Newsmax og OAN – det har vi IKKE i Danmark 🙁

Taget herfra

Godt Nytår

Jeg håber, at I alle går ind i 2025 med fortrøstning. Det gør jeg også – i hvert fald med større fortrøstning end før det amerikanske præsidentvalg.

For hvad var det, som dette valg viste? Det viste, at et flertal af amerikanerne vendte det døve øre til gammelmediernes trommeild af løgne og propaganda. Til deres evindelige ære demonstrerede amerikanerne, at de var oplyste nok til at afvise de skurkagtige journalisters beskyldninger mod Donald Trump for at være en Hitler, der ville afskaffe demokratiet, genindføre slaveriet og sætte politiske modstandere i koncentrationslejre.

Selvfølgelig troede de fleste af dem ikke selv på beskyldningerne, men regnede med, at de havde så meget styr på meningsdannelsen, at den jævne hob ville strømme til valgstederne og kåre det grinende gebis, Kamala Harris. Gennem årtier har amerikanerne nemlig fået indbanket, at demokraterne er det gode parti, som kæmper for arbejderklassen og samfundets svageste. Det har demokraterne haft fire år til at dementere, og medlemmerne af arbejder- og middelklassen var kloge nok til at gennemskue, hvad det demokratiske parti i virkeligheden står for: venstrefløjens og storkapitalens uindskrænkede magt, undergravning af forfatningen og lov og orden, censur mod anderledestænkende og massive overførsler af penge fra de fattige til de rige.

Hvis jeg skulle fremsætte et nytårsønske, ville det være, at også danskerne holder op med at lytte til mediernes lirumlarum, løgne, fordrejelser og bedrag. Sluk dog for det fjernsyn og smid aviserne til forbrænding! Indse at medierne ikke vil dig noget godt, men tjener den globalistiske magtelites interesser. For dem er du bare kvæg, som de engang imellem lokker til at stemme på en række partier, der stort set mener det samme, selv om de puster sig op med påstande om, at det ene er bedre end det andet.

Det demokratiske problem er, at man er nødt til at ty til internationale medier, hvis man vil vide, hvad der sker. Det er ikke uoverkommeligt, for de fleste interesserede forstår engelsk. Ellers kan man få meningen frem ved at benytte Google Translate.

Selv bruger jeg bl.a. Fox News, Newsmax, Breitbart, The Federalist, First Things, Document.dk, Snaphanen, The Gateway Pundit og The Claremont Review of Books. Jeg lytter også med interesse til den engelske kanal Talk og til tyske, franske og andre udenlandske TV-kanalers engelsksprogede udgaver, samt hvad jeg i øvrigt falder over.

Det tager alt sammen sin tid, og man kunne ønske, at der i det mindste var én dansk avis eller ét medie, der bestræbte sig på at bringe objektive nyheder og analyser. Det kan man imidlertid kigge langt efter.

Mit nytårsønske må være, at danskerne holder op med at lade sig fordumme af propagandaspredere.

Måske vil det hjælpe, hvis Trumps administration bliver så stor en succes, at selv samvittighedsløse journalister ikke kan skjule det.

Godt Nytår!

Taget herfra

Her er en ganske interessant artikel om hvorfor “What was so different this time about Trump’s election?” af Victor Davis Hanson

Taget herfra

In the weeks before the 2016 Trump Electoral College victory, Donald Trump was polling between 35 and 40 percent.

He would average only about 41% approval over his tumultuous four-year tenure.

No one knows what lies ahead over the next four years. But for now, Trump already polls at well over 50% approval.

Trump’s inauguration in a few weeks likely will not resemble his 2016 ceremony.

In the 2016-7 transition, Democratic-affiliated interests ran commercials urging electors to become “faithless,” and thus illegally to reject their states’ popular votes and instead elect the loser, Hillary Clinton.

Massive demonstrations met Trump on Inauguration Day.

In less than four months after assuming the presidency, Special Counsel Robert Mueller was appointed to investigate the hoax of Russian collusion.

That wasted 22-month, $40 million investigation found no collusion, but did derail the first two Trump years.

What followed the collusion ruse was a consistent effort to undermine the Trump presidency — two subsequent impeachments, the laptop “disinformation” hoax, the COVID-19 nationwide lockdown, and news suppression of any mention of the Chinese lab origin of the virus or questioning the closing of schools.

In the Trump administration’s last summer of 2020, 120 days of riot, arson, looting, assault, and murder followed, with the denouement of the January 6 turmoil.

In contrast, during the 2024-5 transition, Trump has all but assumed the presidency. Over 100 foreign leaders have elbowed each other to be invited to Mar-a-Lago or to phone in their congratulations to the newly elected Trump.

Remember that in 2016 the left screamed “Logan Act” if a Trump transition appointee even talked with foreign officials.

So why is newly elected Trump a veritable cultural hero in 2024 in a fashion unimaginable eight years ago when the media had rendered him a near demon?

One, Trump is seen now as a welcome relief.

A departing and unpopular President Joe Biden will leave with about a 36% approval rating.

The prior Biden years are now seen as abnormal, if not disastrous.

The left’s cultural revolution championed fringe policies never quite seen before: destroying the border, welcoming in 12 million illegal aliens, nihilist critical race and legal theories, institutionalizing a third sex, and mandating woke/DEI quotas and indoctrination sessions.

Yet Biden had inherited from Trump a secure border, an economy rebounding after the COVID quarantines, 1.23% inflation, no wars abroad, and cheap energy.

Four years later, the outgoing Biden administration is widely unpopular. Almost every one of its policies polls below 50%.

In response, Trump promises not just to restore his first-term success, but to expand it.

Two, Trump personally remains transparent, upbeat, and energetic — eager to meet with anyone, anytime, anywhere, to talk about anything.

His energy offers a sharp contrast with the era of non-compos-mentis Biden. The change is welcomed by an electorate exhausted by past presidential stumbling, wandering, incoherence, mind-freezes, and angry, “get-off-my-grass” aged fragility.

Three, Trump is grudgingly admired, now even by some of his enemies who once sought but failed to destroy him.

He endured two impeachments, five civil and criminal court indictments, incessant lawfare, a 95% negative media coverage, attempts to remove him from states’ ballots, and two assassination attempts.

Yet all these unprecedented hostile efforts to end Trump may only have made him stronger — and more empathetic when seen as a target of increasingly fanatical enemies.

Four, Trump has expanded his MAGA base and permanently branded it as an ecumenical movement that welcomes shared class interests rather than fixates on the tired old tribal racial and ethnic chauvinism.

Trump also brought in disaffected Democrats, independents, and minorities in a way the Democrats could not with the evaporating and bitter “Never Trump” dead-enders.

Trump’s veritable campaign menagerie of RFK, Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, Dana White, and Kid Rock made it impossible for the Left to demonize MAGA Republicans as right-wing aristocrats, war-mongers or laissez-faire capitalists.

Fifth, the endorsements of the Biden-Harris legacy media, calcified Hollywood endorsers, blowhard university faculties, and tech barons proved overrated.

It was trumped by more popular and dynamic internet influencers, podcasters, bloggers, and maverick entrepreneurs.

Sixth and finally, Trump himself proved more experienced and reflective than in 2016. His team too was more disciplined and street smart, led by savvy chief of staff Susan Wiles.

The past year has seen truly pivotal moments of Trump as an everyman — posing for a mugshot after being railroaded by a weaponized lawfare indictment, serving McDonald’s drive-through customers, riding in a garbage truck cab, and raising his fist and yelling “fight, fight, fight” — after having his head near blown off by a would-be assassin.

Add all of these once unimaginables up, and the people trusted more — and liked better — the Trump reboot than grouchy Biden or inane and inauthentic Vice President Kamala Harris, as well as their shared extremist agendas.

( Hanson’s latest book is “The Dying Citizen” from Basic Books. Buy it in hardcover at a 58% discount! by clicking here or order in KINDLE edition at a 41% discount by clicking here. Sales help fund JWR.)

(COMMENT, BELOW)

Victor Davis Hanson is the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow in Residence in Classics and Military History at the Hoover Institution, a professor of classics emeritus at California State University at Fresno, and a nationally syndicated columnist for Tribune Media Services.

Taget herfra

3 Kommentarer

  1. Indiske og israelske nyheder har for mig at se også været interessante. Dels fortæller de nyhederne fr en anden vinkel. Dels lefler de ikke dekadente for islam.

    • Jeg benytter mig også af Firstpost fra Indien, de har et langt mere neutralt syn på EU og NATO landene, da de ikke har nogen interessekonflikter og heller ikke er inviteret med i den globale dagsordens mediecirkel.

  2. OT:
    TV2 Fake News er i total panik, fordi Musk har skrevet et læserbrev i en tysk avis, hvor han giver sin fulde opbakning til AfD.
    En soyboy af en ung “mandlig journalist” havde næsten tårer i øjnene, da han grådkvalt fortalte de stakkels seere, at Musk nu ville udbrede den “højreradikale trumpisme” til Tyskland.
    Nu mangler vi bare, at den venstreradikale “journalist” Uffe Dreesen sammenligner Musk med Hitler.

Leave a Reply

Din email adresse vil ikke blive vist offentligt.


*


Dette site anvender Akismet til at reducere spam. Læs om hvordan din kommentar bliver behandlet.