Det skriver Hans Rustad her
Ovenstående illustration er fra 2020 og stadig 100% aktuel 🙁
Taget herfra
Justitsministeriets generalinspektør, Michael Horowitz, har udarbejdet en rapport om den 6. januar, der bekræfter, at der var 26 undercover-agenter til stede uden for Capitol Hill den 6. januar, men ingen agenter. Forsvarerne af de tiltalte fra 6. januar er yderst skeptiske over for dette på baggrund af det, der er kommet frem i retssagerne: FBI infiltrerede grupper som Proud Boys og Oathkeepers, og videooptagelser viser, at de anstiftede urolighederne den 6. januar. Men ingen – hverken informanter eller agenter – er nogensinde blevet retsforfulgt.
Det behøver ikke at have været FBI-agenter. USA har 18 efterretningstjenester, og hvis der var en plan om at storme kongressen for at kompromittere Trump, ville det være tåbeligt at koordinere indsatsen via skriftligt materiale på forhånd.
Men FBI-direktør Christopher Wray var den eneste, der var fraværende ved møderne, da forsvarsministeriet og Det Hvide Hus den 5. januar koordinerede indsatsen forud for den 6. januar. Trump havde tilbudt 10.000 soldater fra nationalgarden, hvilket Nancy Pelosi og borgmester Bowser afslog.
I dag meddelte Wray, at han træder tilbage. Iagttagere mener, at det var for at undgå at svare på spørgsmål om rapporten.
Wray har foretaget flere træk, som bør lamme Kash Patel, når han efterfølger Wray.
The Washington Timesberettede onsdag, at den vanærede FBI-direktør har iværksat en forbryderisk plan for at redde sine kumpaner fra afskedigelse og lægge både Trump og Patel i håndjern i processen.
Wray er ikke kun begyndt at forfremme sine seniormedarbejdere for at “grave” dem ind i afdelingen, men en plan er under udvikling for at forsinke Patels indtræden i agenturet i flere måneder.
Det er en slange.
Hvilken slange.
Fra The Washington Times:
Kilder i agenturet sagde, at Wray er begyndt at forfremme medarbejdere i den øverste ledelse, dem, der tjener i agenturets ledelse. Disse kilder beskrev dette som et forsøg på at grave etablerede personer dybere ind i FBI.
Kilder siger, at der udarbejdes en plan for at forsinke den nye FBI-direktørs ankomst til bureauet i tre til fire måneder. The Washington Times noterer at denne afskyelige plan er risikabel i betragtning af Trumps direkte fjendtlighed over for FBI, men Wray vil ikke lade sig afskrække. Og Wray kan slippe af sted med det.
En af de første ting, Wray gjorde, da han tiltrådte, var at beordre overvågning af de folk, der undersøgte Rusland-samarbejdet i Kongressen. En af dem var Kash Patel.
26 informanter i mængden
Der var 26 FBI-informanter til stede, siger rapporten, men kun nogle få gik ind i udelukkelseszonen, og endnu færre var inde på Capitol Hill. Ingen af disse er blevet retsforfulgt. Flere af dem var rejst til hovedstaden på egen hånd, hævdes det i rapporten. Det gør det endnu mere mærkeligt, at de ikke blev behandlet på samme måde som de andre demonstranter.
Men de, der har fulgt retssagerne, tror ikke et øjeblik på, at der ikke var agenter fra føderale myndigheder til stede. Men de behøvede ikke at kende til hinanden, selv ikke inden for FBI, som har 51 kontorer. Der er ingen tvivl om, at FBI har trukket et slør af glemsel over det, der skete den 6. januar. Alternative medier har gravet navnene frem på flere personer, som var til stede.
NTB vælger den systemiske version.
FBI-informanter var til stede under stormningen af Kongressen i 2021, men ingen undercover-agenter, ifølge en ny undersøgelsesrapport.
Generalinspektøren for det amerikanske justitsministerium står bag rapporten, som blev præsenteret torsdag.
Generalinspektøren for det amerikanske justitsministerium står bag rapporten, som blev præsenteret torsdag.
En af konklusionerne er, at FBI ikke sendte undercover-agenter ud for at deltage i den protest, der endte med stormningen af Kongressen.
Derimod var tre informanter, som var til stede, blevet bedt om at skaffe oplysninger om personer, der var mistænkt for indenlandsk terrorisme. En af informanterne gik ind i Kongressen, men havde ikke på forhånd fået tilladelse fra FBI til at bryde loven eller opfordre andre til at gøre det.
Rapportens resultater modsiger en konspirationsteori om, at FBI-agenter angiveligt i al hemmelighed bidrog til stormningen af Kongressen den 6. januar 2021.
Rapporten konkluderer også, at FBI burde have gjort mere for at indsamle efterretninger forud for stormningen – noget, der kunne have gjort det føderale politi bedre forberedt på det, der skete.(NTB)
Taget herfra
opdateret:
20 (or So) Obvious Questions about January 6
Taget herfra
December 14, 2024
20 (or So) Obvious Questions about January 6
By Jack Cashill
Even before Donald Trump ascends to the presidency on January 20, his appointees should ask themselves the questions that follow — all of them simple and straightforward. With Christopher Wray stepping down from the FBI directorship, they will have a much better chance of getting straight answers quickly.
Trump’s team should then share those answers widely. This information will make President Trump’s pardon of more than 1,500 Americans much more comprehensible to the American public and much less controversial.
–Although now the FBI admits to having 26 confidential human sources in the crowd on January 6, how many total “assets” did the FBI and other entities plant, and what roles did they play?
–For what entity was Ray Epps working and under what terms?
–Who planted the pipe bombs outside the DNC and near the RNC headquarters?
–Who instructed Kamala Harris to conceal the fact that she was at the DNC when the bomb was found and why?
–Why did Harris allow hundreds of J6ers to be prosecuted for threatening her designated space at the Capitol when she wasn’t at the Capitol?
–Who were the “two law enforcement officials” who told the New York Times that “pro-Trump rioters” fatally struck Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick with a fire extinguisher, inflicting “a bloody gash in his head”?
–Who orchestrated the 100-day-plus suppression of Sicknick’s autopsy report?
–If Sicknick was not murdered, as the DOJ finally conceded, why did a federal judge give Julian Khater an 80-month prison sentence for spritzing Sicknick with an over-the-counter pepper spray?
–Has there been an official inquiry into the subsequent suicide deaths of four USCP officers, and if not, why has the DOJ routinely blamed the J6ers for causing those deaths?
–Why was there no crime scene investigation in the likely homicide of Rosanne Boyland?
–Who chose to ignore the obvious video evidence of Boyland being suffocated as a result of a police action and to falsely blame her death on an amphetamine overdose?
–Who suppressed the Boyland autopsy report for 90 days and stonewalled her family at every turn?
–Why was Lila Morris, the Metropolitan P.D. officer caught on video repeatedly bashing the unconscious Boyland over the head with a tree branch, not even disciplined?
–Why was Metropolitan P.D. lieutenant Jason Bagshaw promoted despite having been caught on video bashing the defenseless Victoria White bloody?
–Why did the DOJ not interview the eyewitnesses to the shooting death of Ashli Babbitt?
–Why did the USCP coddle and promote Babbitt’s killer, Michael Byrd, despite a shooting that, according to use-of-force expert Stan Kephart, “violated not only the law but his oath”?
–Who ordered the “shock and awe” raids on the homes of hundreds of non-violent protesters and why?
–Why has the so-called “Scaffold Commander” not been arrested despite multiple clear images of his face?
–Why has the man who constructed the mock gallows on the Capitol grounds not been arrested despite multiple clear images of his face?
–Why did the USCP allow the gallows to stand unmolested on Capitol grounds for more than four hours before the crowds gathered?
–Why was Emanuel Jackson quickly set free despite having been caught on video swinging a baseball bat at police officers over a two-hour period?
–If there was no insurrection, as the DOJ conceded, why were the sentences given to the J6ers so much more severe than the $30–50 fines given to the protesters who physically obstructed the Kavanaugh hearings?
These are the simple questions, the ones off the top. I am sure readers will think of others I may have overlooked. To be sure, more probing questions need to be asked about the January 6 Select Committee report as well as the charging documents for the J6ers.
Having read through much of this material, I am impressed by how casually — and routinely — our elected officials and federal jurists distort the facts to protect the party line. In short, they lie, and some have done so under oath.
I am impressed, too, by the shamelessness of a DOJ that can boast of its success rate in securing convictions, knowing that the accused were allowed no change of venue and faced juries pulled from a pool 95 percent anti-Trump. This needs to change.
More questions need to be asked as well about the security failures at all levels on January 6. In his otherwise worthy book, Government Gangsters, Kash Patel more or less exonerates the Pentagon. He should not have. Incompetence explains much of what went wrong on January 6, but so does treason.
Nearly 1,600 American citizens were arrested for exercising their First Amendment rights on January 6, and roughly half of them have been incarcerated. Save for the insurrectionists among them — if there were any — the rest deserve not just commutation of their sentences, but a full pardon. Many may deserve compensation. And all deserve the truth.
To learn more, see Jack Cashill’s newest book, Ashli: The Untold Story of the Women of January 6.
Taget herfra
opdateret
Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse mere
Det første Kash Patel skal gøre når han indtager posten, er at bede om navne og personaledokumenterne på alle i ledelsen som Wray har forfremmet og straks beordre dem suspenderet, indtil deres papirer er blevet gennemgået.
Det vil næppe være muligt at gøre det optimale, hvilket er at tilbageholde dem og holde dem isoleret indtil deres ageren i FBI er grundigt blevet gransket.
Alle der er trådt frem som whistleblowers, skal genansættes og placeres i en taskforce der har til opgave at rydde op.
glimrende ide !
mvh trumfEs