Poll viser at selv republikanske vælgere ikke støtter Trumps Grønlands plan med at bruge militær magt

Nu skal man jo altid være varsom med polls, men der er flere, der viser samme mønster. Det undrer mig at man ikke har stillet samme spørgsmål uden militær magt … Det ville nok goke et andet resultat

Taget herfra

American voters across party lines are delivering a stunning rebuke to President Trump’s Greenland acquisition plans, with even his own Republican base overwhelmingly rejecting military action by margins that shock political observers.

Story Snapshot

  • 86% of voters oppose military force to take Greenland, including 68% of Republicans
  • Trump imposed 10% tariffs on NATO allies deploying troops to Greenland
  • Massive protests erupted in Greenland’s capital against US takeover attempts
  • Bipartisan lawmakers warn that the policy weakens America and aids adversaries

Overwhelming Bipartisan Opposition Emerges

Multiple polling organizations confirm unprecedented voter unity against Trump’s Greenland military option. Quinnipiac University found 86% opposition nationwide, while Reuters/Ipsos documented 71% calling force a “bad idea.”

Even among Trump’s Republican base, 68% reject military action—a remarkable departure from typical partisan support patterns. CNN polling reinforced these findings with 75% opposing any US control attempt, demonstrating rare cross-party consensus on foreign policy.

Trump Escalates with NATO Tariff Threats

President Trump announced 10% tariffs effective February 1st on eight NATO allies, including Denmark, after they deployed troops to Greenland for Arctic exercises. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen defended the deployments as legitimate Arctic security measures under NATO frameworks.

The tariff announcement followed failed White House negotiations in mid-January, where fundamental disagreements over Greenland’s status proved insurmountable despite Trump’s national security justifications.

Strategic Concerns Mount Among Conservative Lawmakers

Republican and Democratic legislators united in opposing Trump’s approach, arguing existing NATO arrangements provide necessary Arctic access without territorial seizure. Bipartisan lawmakers warned that tariffs against allies would harm American businesses while benefiting adversaries like Putin and Xi Jinping.

The rare GOP dissent reflects deeper concerns about constitutional principles and alliance stability, with 66% of voters expressing worry about NATO relations deteriorating under current policies.

Congressional opposition emphasizes that Greenland’s Thule Air Base already serves US strategic interests through established agreements. Lawmakers argue that Trump’s aggressive stance undermines decades of alliance-building that have secured American interests without territorial conquest.

This constitutional conservative position aligns with traditional limited government principles while maintaining a strong national defense through cooperative partnerships rather than expansionist policies.

Greenland Resistance and Alliance Fractures

Massive “Stop Trump” demonstrations filled Nuuk, Greenland’s capital, as residents rejected American control attempts. The protests highlight local sovereignty concerns that resonate with American voters who understand self-determination principles.

Denmark maintains that Greenland remains non-negotiable, creating a diplomatic stalemate that threatens broader NATO cohesion. Arctic geopolitics involve competing Russian and Chinese interests, making alliance unity crucial for containing authoritarian expansion rather than creating new divisions among democratic partners.

The polling data reveal that American voters recognize these strategic realities, with opposition to military force remaining stable since 2025 despite Trump’s renewed push.

This represents a significant challenge to presidential authority when even core supporters reject aggressive territorial expansion as inconsistent with American values and practical national interests.

Sources:

US voters widely opposed to taking Greenland by military force — even most Republicans

Trump announces tariffs on NATO allies opposing US control of Greenland

Trump Greenland poll reveals broad opposition

Most Americans remain opposed to seizing Greenland with military force

Americans oppose using military force to take possession of Greenland

Taget herfra

3 Kommentarer

  1. B-52 bombere mod slædehunde? Tror MSM selv på den latterlige påstand? Ekstrabladet og DR osv. blander falske citater og halve sandheder sammen i en pærevælling .
    20. januar 2026 ved 11:48

    Er det ikke en falsk MSM påstand, at Trump har
    tænkt sig at angribe de to hundepatruljer med
    militær magt?!! Er det andet end grov manipulation?

  2. Tåbelig poll. Den eneste der afgørende er, hvad USA vil betale og ved hvilket niveau for den amerikanske pakke i kr og ører (USD) stemningen skifter blandt grønlænderne og de dermed vælger sig en ny sengekammerat. Ham Jørgen Boassen har forbløffende mange venner på FB ! Mestendels tågehorn, men også en del politikkere med tyngde.

  3. Tyngden af relationer er som regel af pekuniær art, med mindre
    andet gør sig gældende såsom:
    — kan ikke lige komme på noget.
    Kvinder ville kalde det kærlighed, tænker jeg, men den holder som regel ikke for en dybere analyse.

Leave a Reply

Din email adresse vil ikke blive vist offentligt.


*


Dette site anvender Akismet til at reducere spam. Læs om hvordan din kommentar bliver behandlet.