“Swalwell accused of sexual assault, misconduct in ‘STUNNING’ allegations”

Det er med en vis portion skadefryd at jeg iagttager det demokratiske partis pludselige angreb på Swalell 🙂

Du husker nok at han bollede fang-fang , der viste sig at være kinesisk spion !

Alligevel støttede det demokratiske parti 100% den inkompetente klovn, fordi han var Trump hader

Men jeg synes det er påfaldende at nu , hvor det demokratiske parti åbenbart har fundet ud af at han vil tabe sit forsøg på at blive senator i Californien, så VIPS kommer der – “tilfældigvis nu” 4 kvinder frem med påstande om at han har overfaldet dem seksuelt …

Det nummer har vi set mange gange før, men næsten altid kun mod republikanere !

Prøv at høre, hvad en af anklagerne, som selvfølgelig IKKE tør træde frem og vise sit ansigt ,påstår her:

Lyder det særligt sandsynligt at hun efter at blevet påstået voldtaget i 2019, alligevel skulle være i samme rum med ham igen i 2024 ?

Eller lyder det som rent opspind ?

Selv om jeg ikke kan fordrage den dybt inkompetente Swalwell tror jeg mest på den anden hypotese !

Her er en god artikel om det med lidt flere detaljer :

The women behind the Swalwell sexual assault charges

Taget herfra

Four women have now charged Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell with varying instances of sexual wrongdoing, including rape. Swalwell has denied the charges, but my bias against him makes me ready to believe them. Swalwell, after all, radiates creepiness, and who can forget Fang Fang?

Still, I have no sympathy for the women who have now come forward. If you read the media reports, they strike me as people who covered up for Swalwell when he was in power and have now volunteered to help out because the Democrats need him to drop out of the California gubernatorial race. (Monica Showalter details the party’s unsavory machinations, which don’t extend to forcing him out of Congress, something you’d think they’d want to do with an accused rapist.) For that reason, it seems that these women may simultaneously be enablers and operatives rather than classic victims.

Here’s what we know:

The most serious claims come from an unnamed woman who began to work in Swalwell’s San Francisco office in 2019, when she was 21. The 45-year-old Swalwell, who was and is married, was soon sending her Snapchat pictures of his genitals and asking her to send him nude pictures of herself. He later tried to kiss her. Then, in true Bill Clinton style (although seated in a car, not the Oval Office), he unzipped his pants and asked for oral sex. She complied.

Not long after, Swalwell took her out for drinks, at which point she got blind drunk and woke up naked in his hotel bed. She had no memory of what had happened but felt as if she’d had sex. She later claimed to be bruised and bloody.

But she said nothing.

In April 2024, this alleged “rape” victim went out for drinks with her alleged “rapist,” at which time she again became blind drunk. Three days later, she texted a friend that Swalwell had “sexually assaulted” her, explaining to her friend that she “blacked out,” but remembered telling him to “stop,” which he ignored. In the same text messages, she told her friend about the 2019 experience when she blacked out, and he had sex with her. She apparently told the story to others, too.

A few things: One, this woman has a drinking problem. Two, “blacked out” and “passed out” aren’t the same. While she later may not have remembered what happened, that doesn’t mean Swalwell forced himself on an unconscious woman (although the second time, he does seem to have forced himself on an unwilling woman, which, if true, is textbook rape).

Three, again, she said nothing. In speaking with the San Francisco Chronicle, the woman basically said that her career mattered more than getting justice against a predator:

The woman said she largely kept quiet about Swalwell’s behavior for years out of fear she would suffer personal and professional consequences.

“He was the foundation of my career. I had nothing to fall back on or anyone to vouch for my skills outside of my colleagues in that office and Eric himself,” she told the Chronicle. “I knew if I came forward, it would define me and undermine my credibility.”

Clearly, when she says she kept quiet for years out of fear, she’s speaking of the 2019 encounter. Yet five years later, there she was again, going off with Swalwell, getting drunk, and waking up in bed after having blacked out. That’s just weird.

Still, when the Democrat party needed her, she was there with an accusation ready-made to help the party oust Swalwell from the California gubernatorial race. Presumably, Democrats were worried that too many Democrats were running in California’s open primary, splitting the vote and paving the way for a Republican.

Three more women had their own tales of Swalwell’s sexual improprieties—and, again, I’m willing to believe them. One woman said she ended up super drunk in his hotel room and blacked out. However, she remembered that early in the evening, he kissed her and touched her leg “without her consent.”

If he was doing that while she was still sober enough to object, why did she continue drinking with him, to the point where she was dead drunk in his hotel room? This woman, too, told family and friends about what happened, but she said nothing.

(You can read details of all these interactions here.)

Here are some things that trouble me: This is not the 1950s or before, when women were cast from their homes or permanently shamed if they were raped. This is not the Muslim world, where women are executed if they’re raped, or forced to marry their rapist. Instead, all these things happened in the post-#MeToo, “believe all women” era, when coming forward was brave and powerful.

And in each case, these women said nothing until it was politically convenient for them to say something.

Swalwell is an awful human being, and I wouldn’t put it past him, even as he loudly proclaims his fealty to “women’s issues,” to abuse women who are drawn to power, especially women with incapacitating drinking problems.

But I can’t get past the fact that, in today’s day and age, all these women let him get away with it. I can’t help but think that they either viewed the interactions as consensual, in which case there was never sexual assault, or, even after feeling as if they had been assaulted, they had no intention of destroying their access to someone who was, for quite some time, at the very heart of Democrat political power in America.

And that’s why, even if it’s true that Eric Swalwell sexually assaulted the women, it’s hard for me to view them as victims in the classic sense of the word. I know I sound like a censorious old woman, but we’ve seen Democrats destroy way too many young men over the years based on the most bizarre and unbelievable claims of sexual assault.

My breaking point on this issue was the case against Brock Smith, the Stanford freshman, whose life was destroyed when an older woman crashed a frat party, got blind drunk, and ended up rutting with him on the street. At some point, she passed out, but he was too drunk to realize. We have no idea who consented to what, but she was automatically denominated the victim, and he was tried as a predator. ‘

What they both were was drunk and stupid. Ever since then, stories like these have angered me, maybe because I was worried my son would be falsely charged while he was in college.

And one more thing: My mother and your mother were right when they told us that women who drink too much end up in trouble.

Taget herfra