I nat angreb USA 3 iranske atom-bombe-anlĂŠg Natanz, Isfahan og Fordow med 12 af de store GBU-57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker busters đ
Trump meldte dette ud i nat kl ca 04:00 og har meddelt at alle 3 anlĂŠg er Ăždelagte:
Det er interessant at USA – udover Fordow – ogsĂ„ bombede de to anlĂŠg Natanz og Isfahan . Trump ville vĂŠre HELT sikker pĂ„ at de blev Ăždelagte đ
Nu venter vi pĂ„ 2 ting: satellit-fotos fra de 3 anlĂŠg, og sĂŠdvanlige klynken og jamren fra det anti-Israel/USA FN , de ditto klynkende EU-ledere samt de klynkende sunni-muslimske lande, som er lykkelige over at USA – og Israel – har fjernet den iranske atom-trussel
Fake-news-msm reagerer – igen pĂ„ samme mĂ„de overalt – og pĂ„stĂ„r at USA nu er en den af krigen mellem Israel og Iran
Det ved ingen p.t. – og da specielt ikke fake-news-msm
Iran har et meget vanskeligt valg, for Trump har udtrykkeligt sagt at angrebet pÄ de 3 atom-anlÊg er et enkeltstÄende angreb, og at USA IKKE gÞr mere, med mindre Iran vÊlger at angribe amerikanske mÄl i MellemÞsten
Iran har mange kortrÊkkende missiler, som ikke kan nÄ Israel,men sagten kan ramme amerikanske mÄl i MellemÞsten.
I sÄ fald vil USA virkelig angribe mullah-styret
SĂ„ Iran har valget mellem pest eller kolera : angribe amerikanske mĂ„l eller virke tandlĂžs , fordi Iran allerede HAR “lovet” at gengĂŠlde et amerikansk angreb
DR dokumenterer sin totale uvidenhed her i denne “analyse” af Puk DamsgĂ„rd :
Taget herfra
I flere Ă„rtier har Israels premierminister Benjamin Netanyahu drĂžmt om netop det, der skete i nat. At USA ville angribe Irans atomfaciliteter.
Et skridt Netanyahu selv betegner som âmodigtâ. I det har han ret. I denne skrivende stund lyder luftalarmen over Israel.
Amerikanske prÊsidenter har indtil i dag afholdt sig fra at angribe Irans atomprogram. PrÊsident Obama sÞgte i stedet diplomatiet og indgik sammen med andre lande og Iran en atomaftale i 2015, der skulle sikre, at Iran ikke udviklede atomvÄben. En aftale, som Netanyahu ikke brÞd sig om.
En aftale, der ikke var perfekt – Iran fortsatte sit ballistiske missil-program – men den virkede, indtil Trump trak sig fra den i 2018.
—-
Taget herfra
Mage til VĂ S skal man da lede lĂŠnge efter : Obamas “aftale”, var IKKE en aftale, men en kapitulation, som tillod Iran at FORTSĂTTE med oparbejdningen af Uran i mange Ă„r – OG den “aftale” var det op til Iran SELV at kontrollere !!
SĂ„ rĂŠven blev sat til at passe hĂžns, og resultatet udeblev selvfĂžlgelig ikke : Iran gjorde alt hvad de kunne for at oparbejde uran og vestlige lande ( the usual suspects …) solgte hjertens gerne moderne oparbejdninganlĂŠg
SĂ„ den obama-aftale virkede , men KUN for mullah-styret i Iran …
Her er en god artikel om Irans forsÞg pÄ at anskaffe sig A-vÄben
Thank You Mr. President, Thank You America, Thank You Israel
Taget herfra
- This tiny country [Israel], by itself, has begun putting an end to a “forever war” that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been waging on the West for 46 years. The potential success of such a David-vs-Goliath endeavor would not be possible without the strength, determination, and leadership of US President Donald J. Trump.
- America finally has a president willing to act against terrorism.
- This moment also makes clear that Trump’s actions are not provoking World War III, they are preventing World War III â which Iran has been threatening for almost half a century.
- Now, once again, when Israel needs a true ally â not just someone to offer sympathetic words then threaten to withhold weapons â Trump has offered consistent support. “Israel has to do what they have to do,” he said.
- This kind of Churchillian clarity does not cause chaosâit stops it, just as the allies stopped it in the last century in Germany and Japan. Trump and Netanyahu deserve the Nobel Peace Prize for taking one of the world’s greatest terrorist states off the table.
- This kind of Churchillian clarity does not cause chaos â it stops it, as the WWII allies did in the last century in Germany and Japan. Trump and Netanyahu deserve the Nobel Peace Prize for taking one of the world’s greatest terrorist states off the table.
- Strength does not invite warâit deters it. “When people see a strong horse and a weak horse,” observed the late esteemed psychologist, Osama bin Laden, “they will naturally want to side with the strong horse.” The Middle East is safer today not because of handshakes and summits and signed pieces of paper that usually one side disregards.
- Russia disregarded the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, under which Russia, the United States and Ukraine agreed that Ukraine’s borders would be respected in exchange for giving up the nuclear weapons it had at the time. And half a ton of documents showed that Iran had been cheating on its JCPOA “deal.”
- The Middle East is safer today because Israel struck after… Israeli intelligence determined that Iran was on the brink of assembling a bomb — and because the United States stood behind Israel.
- To those who still criticize, who still think diplomacy alone can solve everything, the answer is simple. As the great Secretary of State George Shultz noted, “Negotiations are a euphemism for capitulation if the shadow of power is not cast across the bargaining table” — in short, diplomacy works best when the enemy knows that it is backed up by force. Iran’s leaders did not take Trump’s 60-day warning seriously, probably because they did not believe he and Netanyahu had the courage to act. They also may be assuming that they can absorb a few blows and build back their nuclear weapons program after that â and precisely why it is crucial to destroy Fordow: to make sure no one can resuscitate it later.
- The time for appeasement is over. For this, we owe our gratitude to three pillars: Trump, the USA under his leadership, and the brave people of Israel who refuse to be victims.
What the world witnessed this past week was not merely a military operation. It was the courageous act of a free nation â Israel â taking one of the bravest and most humane steps in recent memory to stop evil in its tracks. This tiny country, by itself, has begun putting an end to a “forever war” that the Islamic Republic of Iran has been waging on the West for 46 years. The potential success of such a David-vs-Goliath endeavor would not be possible without the strength, determination, and leadership of US President Donald J. Trump.
While many global leaders have stood by passively, hedging their words and calling for “restraint,” Trump showed what true leadership looks like. He did not waver. He did not equivocate. He supported Israel in its fight on behalf of all of us in the Free World — not just in words, but in action, strategy, and unwavering moral clarity.
Israel’s bold, precise strikes on Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure were not acts of aggression — they were acts of self-defense needed to protect the country’s existence after hearing from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that, contrary to the claims — twice — of US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that Iran was not working on a bomb. If you are not working in a bomb, you do not need a Fordow uranium enrichment site.
Either Gabbard’s information was worthless or she was lying to the public to promote a pacifist ideology. Either reason does not exactly inspire confidence. Israel had suffered the unspeakable horror of October 7, when Hamas terrorists, funded and armed by Iran and Qatar, invaded Israel and massacred civilians in cold blood. What other nation on earth would be told to “show restraint” after such a barbaric attack? Did the United States advocate “showing restraint” after 9/11? Yet, that is what most so-called Western leaders have done â telling Israel to have a cease-fire, hold back, limit its response, avoid “escalation.” As if the original atrocity was not escalation enough.
Trump, to his immense credit, and contrary to the Biden administration, did not join that cowardly chorus. Instead, he did what only a true friend and a great leader would do: he stood by Israel — a country the size of New Jersey being attacked on seven fronts — with conviction and clarity.
While others tried to soften their language, Trump said after Israel’s initial air strikes, said that the Israeli operation was “excellent.” He reminded the world that he had given Iran 60 days — a generous chance — to stop advancing toward nuclear weapons. Iran refused the opportunity. Instead of pretending otherwise or hiding behind bureaucratic platitudes, Trump spoke plainly and powerfully: “They got hit hard… More to come.”
Contrast this to the usual diplomatic playbook. How many world leaders immediately ran to the podium after the Hamas invasion in 2023 to pressure Israel to de-escalate and pretended that peace can be achieved by pacifying terrorists and tyrants? Whether such an approach is bad or good is immaterial: it does not work. How many of these politicians care more about being praised by the New York Times than about the future of their countries and the free world? These politicians probably imagine they are projecting virtue; in reality, they are simply projecting cowardice, while enabling violence and tyranny.
Those politicians seem concerned only with appearing “balanced,” even when one side is clearly the aggressor and the other, the victim. Trump never fell into that trap. He made it clear that supporting Israel’s right to defend itself is not just a strategic choice â it is a moral obligation.
Even in his first term, Trump showed backbone that must have maddened his detractors. He charted a course of unapologetic strength and moral clarity. He pulled the US out of the disastrous 2015 JCPOA Iran “nuclear deal,” which was set to legitimize Iran’s acquiring nuclear weapons in October 2025. He ordered the killing of Iran’s leading terrorist, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Major General Qasem Soleimani. Trump defeated Islamic State in Syria in a matter of weeks, moved the U.S. Embassy in to Jerusalem, Israel’s rightful capital; then he brokered the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations.
Now, once again, when Israel needs a true ally â not just someone to offer sympathetic words then threaten to withhold weapons â Trump has offered consistent support. “Israel has to do what they have to do,” he said.
When Iran, in its predictable fury, launched hundreds of ballistic missiles and drones at Israel, the United States military â under Trump’s leadership â has helped to intercept some of them. This is what real partnership looks like. Not lectures, not empty statements, but coordinated defense and mutual trust. Iran’s hegemonic threats are failing because of the strength and cooperation between Israel and a United States, led by Trump. America finally has a president willing to act against terrorism.
This moment also makes clear that Trump’s actions are not provoking World War III, they are preventing World War III â which Iran has been threatening for almost half a century. All that time, Iran has been on a path of escalation â arming terrorist proxies, developing for nuclear weapons, targeting U.S. troops in the Middle East more than 350 times just in the last five years and promising “Death to America” and genocide for Israel.
If the world had remained paralyzed by fear and indecision, if Israel had been pressured into backing down, the consequences could have been catastrophic: a green light for terrorists and aggressors to keep on going. Instead, Trump drew a red line â and when Iran’s leadership crossed it, they paid the price.
This kind of Churchillian clarity does not cause chaos â it stops it, as the WWII allies did in the last century in Germany and Japan. Trump and Netanyahu deserve the Nobel Peace Prize for taking one of the world’s greatest terrorist states off the table.
Strength does not invite warâit deters it. “When people see a strong horse and a weak horse,” observed the late esteemed psychologist, Osama bin Laden, “they will naturally want to side with the strong horse.” The Middle East is safer today not because of handshakes and summits and signed pieces of paper that usually one side disregards.
Russia disregarded the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, under which Russia, the United States and Ukraine agreed that Ukraine’s borders would be respected in exchange for giving up the nuclear weapons it had at the time. And half a ton of documents showed that Iran had been cheating on its JCPOA “deal.”
The Middle East is safer today because Israel struck after the IAEA admitted that Iran had been in breach of its nuclear non-proliferation obligations and because Israeli intelligence determined that Iran was on the brink of assembling a bomb — and because the United States stood behind Israel.
To those who still criticize, who still think diplomacy alone can solve everything, the answer is simple. As the great Secretary of State George Shultz noted, “Negotiations are a euphemism for capitulation if the shadow of power is not cast across the bargaining table” — in short, diplomacy works best when the enemy knows that it is backed up by force. Iran’s leaders did not take Trump’s 60-day warning seriously, probably because they did not believe he and Netanyahu had the courage to act. They also may be assuming that they can absorb a few blows and build back their nuclear weapons program after that â and precisely why it is crucial to destroy Fordow: to make sure no one can resuscitate it later..
The time for appeasement is over. For this, we owe our gratitude to three pillars: Trump, the USA under his leadership, and the brave people of Israel who refuse to be victims.
In a world increasingly dominated by appeasers, enablers and cowards, thank heaven for those who still have the courage to stand tall and fight evil. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, America. And thank you, Israel. May God bless you in this just and noble fight.
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu
Taget herfra
LĂžgnekanalernes gylletanke flyder her til morgen over med l.rt, efter “Den Store Saten” gav Den Virkelige Satan et ordentligt pulver i nat.
MĂ„tte simpelthen slukke for propagandakanalen TV2, da deres hĂ„ndplukkede “ekspertkost” begyndte at verbalon.nere om, hvordan DJT har beriget sig selv!! WHAT??!!!
Burde det ikke snarere handle om, hvordan Iran har BERIGET URAN???
– Jeg synes somikkelen sku’ ta’ et vue ud over Martha’s Vineyard, hvis den vil se VIRKELIG BERIGELSE!!đ€ąđ€ąđ€ąđ€źđ€źđ€źđ€Źđ€Źđ€Ź
De slamkanaler bliver sgu da mere og mere ulidelige at se og hĂžre pĂ„đ
Man mĂ„ lune sig lidt ved, at det skyldes, de slet ikke kan vĂŠre i deres smĂ„ usle kroppe af bar’ ĂŠrgrelse, vrede og blindt HADđ€đ€đ€đ€Łđđđ
Den afdankede hippie Peter Viggo Jakobsen sidder allerede med morgenhĂ„r pĂ„ DDR, og belĂŠrer pĂžblen om, at Iran kun har fĂ„et en “hudafskrabning”.
BrĂŠkspanden er allerede fyldt til randen.đ€ź
Historien gentager sig i den forstand, at Churchill ogsÄ blev kaldt en krigsmager og opvigler i medierne, fordi han advarede mod Hitler.
I morges sĂ„ jeg i Ăžvrigt, at TV2s AI?-genererende oversĂŠttervĂŠrktĂžj tror, at Israels kampagne hedder “The Rising Line”. Det minder om, at gad vide hvornĂ„r AI-hallucinationer bliver sĂ„ dominerende, at de i sig selv kan skabe diplomatiske kriser og krig.
Ja, og AI hallucinationer, har jeg lÊst, har man ingen begreb om hvordan opstÄr!
Trump er en god mand.
Herligt billede.
Jeg havde ikke set, at du allerede havde bragt det sjove billede af Trump m B2 piller til khamenei. đđ
Hej Fru Olsen
jeg bragte fĂžrst en anden illustration til linket, sĂ„ det herlige meme og skiftede memet ind, sĂ„ det kan vĂŠre du har set den fĂžrste “version” đ
mvh TrumfEs
BRAVO. 3 FOLDIGT LEVE. HURRA. Hjertelig tak til USA millitĂŠt. Hjertelig tak til Trump for jernviljen til at sĂŠtte Irans regime stolen for dĂžren. Det er i sandhed en befrielse. TAk.
Hjertelig tak ogsÄ til Israel.